So hey, remember when I said that I'd discovered
an even-more-obscure Batman newspaper comic strip, one which featured what may well be the single rarest Two-Face appearance ever?Well, good news, everyone! I have come into possession of several scans of the strips, including most of the Two-Face stuff! Not all of it, sadly, and I'm missing the
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
These strips actually depress me, sort of. It's clear that whoever wrote them had direct access to all of the Golden Age comics (I mean, how else would you remember the Tweeds and Harvey's charity work? I know that 'Kralik' story referenced it, but still...), or at least the original artwork, probably from the same source. Nowadays, that isn't the case, what with DC not keeping files of anything before the 80s.
I agree about how the good side is drawn, damn that's creepy. For stories that play up the split personality angle, they should utilize it more often.
Also *heh*, Harvey looks like Rod Serling in the flashback. I'd make an "eye of the beholder" joke, but I'm not in clever mode.
Reply
Either they had access to them, or the original comics were reprinted somewhere. I dunno, how prevalent were reprints of those stories by 1971?
Reply
The depressing part is that, at some unspecified time in the early 70s, in order to make room for inventory stories that were drawn in advance, DC burned a lot of the original artwork, printing film and comics that they had kept in files and cupboards. A whole history was lost. This story was clearly done before that, or maybe the writer just had a good collection.
Ever wondered why the linework and color reproduction in the Archives often looks so shitty? It's because they have to digitally redraw the old stories by tracing them from issues they buy from collectors. Ever tried recoloring a whole image in MSpaint after using the erase bar? That's pretty much how they do it.
Reply
... JESUS CHRIST WHY. AUGH!!!! For god's sake, there was already a fan culture with collections and stuff, they couldn't have entrusted some fan or fans with that stuff instead of outright DESTROYING it all?! AUGHAUGHAHHH!!!
Reply
Yeah, there's certainly no reason for them to be "the Wonderland Crimes" that I can think of, unless Harvey was just going to great lengths to come up with a theme that every crook at the table could connect to in some way, as that one "dope comes from poppies" panel would seem to indicate.
Reply
And I still don't know how the Joker fits into the group dynamic. Is he supposed to be the Cheshire Cat in their scheme, or did Catwoman's presence mean he had to pick up the slack as the March Hare? I'm certain the whole scheme was explained much more coherently in those "leftover" strips.
Reply
I'm guessing that the idea was simply to get all of the 'main' Bat-villains in one place so they could get their collective ass whooped, and you can't have a gathering of those without including Mistah J. Maybe he was the Knave of Hearts, or the Jabberwock or something.
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
I feel like someone should bring back the "donating to charities" thing - not only does it show his good side as being more concrete and a good person than the route of "oh, good sides means I won't kill you," but it also kinda harks back to Harvey's desire to clean up Gotham and do good in the community, so even though he made his choice to become a villain his good side still wins out occasionally and is still fighting to improve and save the city.
...That actually makes me feel really sad. Harvey, why are you so tragic?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment