So recently, my
favorite person Cecil Adams decided to take on the
difficult topicsAs a quick aside, I'll note his snide treatment of the actual questioneer is not particularly surprising; he does that with everyone who writes in, no matter what the topic. So it's not a special case, if you've never read his stuff before
(
Read more... )
Reply
Here's what I mean: Abortion ban with no corresponding unwanted pregnancy reduction (UPR because I hate cumbersome phrases) legislation means that just about every woman who has an unwanted pregnancy will still attempt to get an abortion. (WHO, I believe it was a 2001 study). Thus, a lose-lose situation for everyone; for PC, we have danger to a woman's health and for PL you don't save any babies.
But with UPR legislation, you absolutely minimize the number of unwanted pregnancies, and thus absolutely minimize the number of both babies and women who risk their lives. (Probably even smaller than now-- there are women who, because of State legislation, can't get an abortion and who resort to this method regardless of whether there's a ban or not, this will always be the case pre-compromise, because the PL groups will make it so
Reply
Abortion ban + anything is still just that: an abortion ban. That's not a compromise unless you allow unrestricted abortion access at the same time which is obviously impossible.
That's why nothingmuch had it right; RvW, in its current form, is a compromise.
So with that middle ground, let's focus away from abortion related legislation and get to UPR legislation instead. That way we can help save the lives of those women who are risking their lives now as well.
Reply
You claim that the problem is unwanted pregnancies (and its causes) and that abortion legislation only addresses a symptom of this problem.
But then you say that solving the problem at the expense of the symptom isn't a compromise. I thought what you wanted was UPR.
Reply
Right.
And making abortion ILLEGAL helps reduce unwanted pregnancies how?
So, as I have said many times before ... leave RvW as it is; don't touch it. Ignore it. In fact, ignore all legislation related to criminalization.
Instead, focus on setting up resources like sex ed, BC, etc., etc. ... as a way we can all work together.
Reply
Reply
Which is why I said we should ignore abortion legislation ... it's an instant stalemate and RvW is compromise enough.
Reply
RvW is compromise enough.
...the reality of the situation is that apparently it isn't. No one's happy, and everyone's still marginalizing politics over it.
Reply
Good luck.
Reply
Leave a comment