To tell you the truth, I don't give 2 cents about "Terra"Caching. I have nothing against it. To me it's just another flavor of caching. I give AB4N a ration of crap about it when I see him, but it's all good natured ribbing. I had the opportunity to join TC last year. Kenneth invited me. I thought it was quite nice of him. But i declined the
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
Reply
Primary difference is that it has a rating/scoring system for both the caches and cachers; "better quality caches" get higher scores, as do the cachers who hunt them. Lame lamppost micro score = 0. Multistage scenic ammocan in the mountains = 100. Hunt one of each, your individual "rating" would be 50. Those two caches together would rate a 30 - see next.
The scoring/rating system is actually much more complicated than that, but that should give you a gist. It was set up by an ex-"geo"caching guy who built the rating system.
Otherwise, it's just hunting caches.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Not that I hate this fellow, but clearly his actions have been 'TOASTED'.
Reply
Leave a comment