if you're @lollardfish on Twitter, i saw your brief conversation with Mr Ross about witchhunts etc and thought you made very good points. even if he wasnt listening.
I do know the chairs, as it happens (one of them is a dear friend) and, while I don't know details, I'm pretty sure that they weren't influenced by the fame factor over much. I also don't think that the gender of the big name was a factor here in the sense of how much influence. I suspect we will never know exactly what happened, but, while I was personally uncomfortable with the announcement, I do believe that they acted for what they considered good reasons which were not to do with the fame of either Mr Ross or Mr Gaiman, seriously.
That's nice to know. I used the word Stardust instead of fame deliberately, though, because I think there is a difference. Fame seems to me to be less personalised, while Stardust is a sort of glamour that affects different people differently. Fame, and celebrity, seem crass reasons for smart people to do things. But glamours... people don't even realise they are there. In that sense, I think privilege in general is a variant of Stardust, if you see what I mean.
Comments 51
Reply
Reply
Reply
I wish I could arrange to introduce you to my friends (especially my fiddler) at the con, but they will be insane helping Seanan stay sane.
I hope you enjoy it and find it a safe space.
Reply
Reply
Reply
i resemble that remark!
Reply
Reply
Reply
I suspect we will never know exactly what happened, but, while I was personally uncomfortable with the announcement, I do believe that they acted for what they considered good reasons which were not to do with the fame of either Mr Ross or Mr Gaiman, seriously.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment