Slayer's Guide to Female Gamers

Jan 24, 2011 12:23

Hopefully Matt won't mind me dredging up his evidential post from RPGnet in 2002. Funny to see GMS was being a bit of a dick back then too. The more things chance, the more they stay the same... you can find the thread on Google with a search for the book title and 'review' but you'll have to view it 'cached'. Set the Wayback Machine to 2002:

***
Read more... )

lol whut?, cries for attention, culture wars, the depths of human idiocy, writing, cunts, gaming, humour

Leave a comment

Comments 8

sherbetsaucers January 24 2011, 12:29:39 UTC
But you're still a misogynist, right?

Reply

_grimtales_ January 24 2011, 12:35:45 UTC
*LOL*
I have 'misogynistic' traits, I like pictures of pretty naked girls for example.

Reply

sherbetsaucers January 24 2011, 15:10:53 UTC
That and the fact that you think of women as a sub-species.*

*Grim does NOT think of women as a sub-species. He thinks of most people that way.

Reply


ribenademon January 24 2011, 13:29:02 UTC
Sorry I don't know you and I have not read the book, but, it seems pretty crazy that an industry which is historically riddled both in sterotype and reality with misogynist detail is going after a spoof book that acknowledges and defines itself as a joke considering some of the other material out there. :/

I suppose it makes you a soft target that you have placed a disclaimer on the book rather than blissfully pressing onwards with hot elf space babes in chainmail bikinis like many RPG books.

Having actually read Slayers Guide to Amazons -which is admittedly the only RPG book I have ever seen with a centrefold -I would like to ask, did that receive accusations of sexism? Or was that regarded as tongue in cheek/or otherwise acceptable?

Reply

_grimtales_ January 24 2011, 14:05:37 UTC
I'm afraid I don't know 'Bina. I wasn't involved in that one. Knowing the Mongoose lads I'm sure the centrefold was intended with tongue firmly in cheek, even if the rest of the book was not.

Reply

ribenademon January 24 2011, 14:21:51 UTC
Fair enough, and as I suspected. :)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

_grimtales_ January 24 2011, 22:33:57 UTC
Yes.

Reply

_grimtales_ January 24 2011, 22:35:34 UTC
That was a reply to your earlier post, bah.
In reply to this one...

The problem has been people FAILING to read into it and taking it on face value.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up