Re: Sure, Why Not?x_auracle_xSeptember 22 2005, 03:39:13 UTC
Thank you =)
A word - I know that my description was stereotypical. I'm sorry about that, it was sort of tongue-in-cheek, ie. that's the sort of language that would be used by the woman who wanted me to sign her petition. But I stand by my position - I frankly am wholly unconcerned with the pornography industry either way. No offense!
And as for being vengeful, I actually think I was being unclear - "blind and fucking toothless" was meant to mean, "That philosophy leads to people being blind and fucking toothless, and thus pisses me off." So...hope I don't lose points for that, but I wanted to clear that up!
Comments 2
yes
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
A word - I know that my description was stereotypical. I'm sorry about that, it was sort of tongue-in-cheek, ie. that's the sort of language that would be used by the woman who wanted me to sign her petition. But I stand by my position - I frankly am wholly unconcerned with the pornography industry either way. No offense!
And as for being vengeful, I actually think I was being unclear - "blind and fucking toothless" was meant to mean, "That philosophy leads to people being blind and fucking toothless, and thus pisses me off." So...hope I don't lose points for that, but I wanted to clear that up!
Thanks..:)
Reply
Leave a comment