Ten Reasons David Tennant Should Play Brainiac In A Superman Movie

Mar 04, 2012 15:18

With the Superman Movie Franchise (hopefully) restarting, what better way to get excited about it than thinking up casting choices? Here are my Top Ten Reasons David Tennant should play Brainiac:

Read more... )

superman, doctor who, lists, actors, movies, harry potter

Leave a comment

Comments 6

(The comment has been removed)

90scartoonman March 9 2012, 07:03:25 UTC
Appreciate the thumbs up!

Reply


eldarwannabe March 5 2012, 01:29:32 UTC
Yes!

And as a Tennant fan who just hunted down a low-budget Scottish romcom with a whole group of fans, yes. We it will get more fans into the seats. (Of course, I would see it anyway, but I'm one of the few Who fans I know who is also an American Superheroes fan.)

I also think Brainiac would be a good choice of villain. We've done Luthor to death (even thought he is EXTREMELY relevant to the current political climate) and it goes us an opportunity to explore different facets of Superman's character. Plus that franchise could do with a fresh start.

Reply

90scartoonman March 9 2012, 07:06:19 UTC
There's definite room for cross Who/American Superhero fans.

Lex Luthor should always be there, I feel like since the Bryne reboot you can have him as a supporting character/antagonist, but we need more. Brainiac is the logical choice.

Reply


mattzimmer March 5 2012, 16:02:14 UTC
That would be an interesting and bold choice. So that means the editors at DC Comics would never let it happen. I'm still waiting for Lucy Lawless in a live-action Wonder Woman project. Makes perfect sense to everyone but the suits.

Reply

mattzimmer March 5 2012, 16:09:13 UTC
Oh, and watch Doctor Who.

Reply

90scartoonman March 9 2012, 07:22:56 UTC
Sadly, people like Nathan Fillion and Lucy Lawless are too old to play Hal and Diana, according to execs. It's depressing. Some casting decisions have been idiotic (moreso on the DC side) but some have been inspired.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up