48. B. B. Lal, The Sarasvati Flows On: The Continuity of Indian CultureA short, easy-to-read (except for one chapter which seems to come from another book entirely) pop non-fiction summary of the Indus or Harappan Civilization, a Bronze Age culture located in the modern countries of India and Pakistan, which had its own writing system, cities, and
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Reply
I think it's actually VERY valid to be upset that so many history books penned about India are penned by very privileged non-Indian people and upset that more people don't realize that it's a huge problem and has huge cultural, intellectual, and political ramifications for the people who's history is being discussed.
It's something that should be discussed and brought up far more often, if not on this comm then in other places where Indian history or history in general is discussed.
Thank you for reminding me of that.
Reply
And yeah, while I have a great deal of respect for the research and scholarship of non-Indian academic Indologists, I remain wary of their texts being the starting points for someone unfamiliar with the culture.
Thanks for your supportive comment!
Reply
Reply
Also, you mentioned there is a bias in the first book about what topics are and are not discussed. For my own edification, what are those biases? I like to be aware if there are any issues like that when I go into a book, especially if it's a topic that I am so woefully unfamiliar with.
Reply
The Indus is a subject which I study myself, so I could go on forever about the problems with the first book; I just wasn't sure if other people would care. :) Basically, there's currently a right-wing political movement in India known as Hindutva; in a extremely simplistic explanation, you could think of them sort of like Fundamentalist Christians in the US. One aspect of this movement is an emphasis on India as a inherently Hindu nation (some individuals involved with the movement therefore discriminate against other long-standing religious groups in India, like Muslims, Christians, etc; other individuals argue that these groups are culturally Hindu even if they're not religiously Hindu). This manifests within archaeology in efforts to 1) prove that the Indus people believed in Hinduism, because that would show that ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I'm not sure, but if I had to guess, I would say most Hindutva supporters have no problem with them. It's more about Hindu as a culture/religion and not as much about it as a language (since Hindi, at least as it exists today, is a very recent development). I do know Hindutva has been gaining popularity in South Indian Dravidian regions lately, and one would think there would be a bigger difference there than to Bengali.
Anyway, it's a bit complicated.
Yeah, that's to say the least! The whole issue is enormously complicated (particularly when you get into areas like "what does secularism even mean in a multi-religious, non-Western context?"), and I am definitely no sort of expert in modern Indian political/cultural movements. But it is important, and I wish I knew more.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment