Re: sequel. Darn. Well, you more than delivered for the prompt, so I really shouldn't be so greedy!
Yeah, I guess Hank is the obvious choice in retrospect. I kind of saw his motivations as a cross between for science!!! and the collaborator who tries to rationalize his betrayal by convincing himself that he's saving people through cooperation. It's a horrible situation to begin with and I love how you left Hank's motives up to interpretation rather than clear-cut good or evil!
Re: Searchlight 4/4tawabidsAugust 8 2011, 22:58:35 UTC
This has been haunting me since I read it so I came back to read it again, and wow, just as terrifying on the second round, and I figured out a lot more of the ID numbers this time. But I'm still basically speechless. Gah.
Re: Searchlight 4/4
anonymous
August 9 2011, 17:52:56 UTC
Thank you. I'm glad it was still a good read on the second go...
I'm sure the main portion of the numbering system is pretty clear (country code and a serial number), otherwise the system divides into mental, physical, or kinetic mutations. I guess this sometimes becomes a rather vague differentiation (particularly in the case of secondary mutations like Emma's) but I'm sure the most practical or obvious mutation is usually chosen for classification purposes. D:
Thanks for the comment! I love your writing, so I'm happy to have made something you enjoyed to read.
Re: Searchlight 4/4tawabidsAugust 9 2011, 22:43:10 UTC
\o/ yaaay! That's exactly what I thought it all was! The only mutants whose IDs I couldn't figure out were the three who came to live at the searchlight facility with Erik, Charles and Raven - initially I assumed it was just the three boys from First Class, but then of course Hank wasn't one of them so I couldn't be sure of the third.
Re: Searchlight 4/4
anonymous
August 10 2011, 04:33:41 UTC
Writer anon here, and I sort of like leaving readers to interpret what they like, but I will say... This is almost exactly what I had in mind. Angel and Darwin's numbers are inverted, though, from what I imagined (having thought Darwin would be used in genetic testing). But there's definitely a creepier connotation in interpreting Angel's number as "better for genetics"... that Hank would be hoarding female mutants to breed more experimental subjects or the like...
Re: Searchlight 4/4walksbyherselfAugust 9 2011, 03:16:11 UTC
OH MY GOD.
I'm just speechless here. This was breaking my heart pretty much from the word go, and then I saw who the "author" was. 'Gutted' is the only word that comes to mind now. Might be crying a little.
This is an absolutely stunning piece and you should be so proud of it.
Re: Searchlight 4/4apagonAugust 9 2011, 04:01:27 UTC
it was already quite devastating and treating mutants as another species... but gosh, that last line was just a punch in the gut... thank you for sharing this brilliant piece...
Re: Searchlight 4/4pentre_katblakeAugust 9 2011, 10:04:32 UTC
Amazing, absolutely amazing.
The epistolary format works brilliantly and wonderfully shows the dehumanization, shows how our team is viewed and treated. It pushes the reader to use imaginations since it doesn't just STATE anything, the same as it doesn't use any names and we STILL know about whom is the writer speaking. (And it is kind of awful, isn't it?)
I clapped when I saw who signed the letter. At first I thought it would be the Man in Black, but at the end of Part Two I thought, it's Hank. Oh my gosh, it's Hank. And it was and you have no idea how it thrilled me, in a wrong, wrong way. Because Hank - well, this is hypocrisy. And survival mechanism. And it is so deliciously perverse.
Re: Searchlight 4/4
anonymous
August 9 2011, 18:00:24 UTC
Because Hank - well, this is hypocrisy. And survival mechanism
I wanted it a bit vague on motivation for Hank, but... But really, in situations like this, I think it's very easy for people to become their own enemy, to do anything just to survive. I attempted (vaguely!) to foreshadow who was writing, but I'll admit to not being certain how much of Hank's voice would get through on a form letter, you know?
Reply
Yeah, I guess Hank is the obvious choice in retrospect. I kind of saw his motivations as a cross between for science!!! and the collaborator who tries to rationalize his betrayal by convincing himself that he's saving people through cooperation. It's a horrible situation to begin with and I love how you left Hank's motives up to interpretation rather than clear-cut good or evil!
Reply
Reply
I'm sure the main portion of the numbering system is pretty clear (country code and a serial number), otherwise the system divides into mental, physical, or kinetic mutations. I guess this sometimes becomes a rather vague differentiation (particularly in the case of secondary mutations like Emma's) but I'm sure the most practical or obvious mutation is usually chosen for classification purposes. D:
Thanks for the comment! I love your writing, so I'm happy to have made something you enjoyed to read.
Reply
Reply
From what I guess, USA-P-00104 = Angel, USA-P-00108 = Darwin, USA-K-00068 = Havok, and USA-K-00094 = Banshee.
Reply
So feel free to interpret however! :D
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I tip my hat back at you for the awesome comment. Thanks for reading!
Reply
Reply
I'm just speechless here. This was breaking my heart pretty much from the word go, and then I saw who the "author" was. 'Gutted' is the only word that comes to mind now. Might be crying a little.
This is an absolutely stunning piece and you should be so proud of it.
Reply
Reply
The epistolary format works brilliantly and wonderfully shows the dehumanization, shows how our team is viewed and treated. It pushes the reader to use imaginations since it doesn't just STATE anything, the same as it doesn't use any names and we STILL know about whom is the writer speaking. (And it is kind of awful, isn't it?)
I clapped when I saw who signed the letter. At first I thought it would be the Man in Black, but at the end of Part Two I thought, it's Hank. Oh my gosh, it's Hank. And it was and you have no idea how it thrilled me, in a wrong, wrong way. Because Hank - well, this is hypocrisy. And survival mechanism. And it is so deliciously perverse.
Reply
I wanted it a bit vague on motivation for Hank, but... But really, in situations like this, I think it's very easy for people to become their own enemy, to do anything just to survive. I attempted (vaguely!) to foreshadow who was writing, but I'll admit to not being certain how much of Hank's voice would get through on a form letter, you know?
Thanks for the comment.
Reply
Leave a comment