The Patmans of Sweet Valley, (Sweet Valley Saga Magna Edition)

Nov 05, 2007 07:28

The Patmans of Sweet Valley, (Sweet Valley Saga Magna Edition)

Because I love Bruce Patman, even if he is kind of evil. Hey, at least he’s better then Todd. :)

Read more... )

sweet valley high, magna edition, bruce patman, recapper: leah1878

Leave a comment

Comments 26

zippyladoodles November 5 2007, 13:16:32 UTC
This book got a bit heavy with miscarriages being mentioned didn't it? Lol.

Great recap, although I am confused about who's son Hank is....

Reply

leah1878 November 5 2007, 13:25:35 UTC
Thank you! Sorry, Hank is Reginald's son.

Reply

zippyladoodles November 5 2007, 13:45:18 UTC
I like the swapped baby storyline. That's kinda cool :-)!!

Reply

esc_key November 7 2007, 21:20:19 UTC
Which is funny because in "Bruce's Story", Hank's father was named Alexander.

Reply


moonspinner November 5 2007, 13:41:41 UTC
First: I love your icon! May I snag?

Great review. Now I want someone to do the Wakefields Story: The Untold Legacy. My mid-teenage mind notes it as the best of the Sweet Valley stories, complete with mature themes like illegitimate children and 'getting over your soulmate'.

Reply

daniellafromage November 5 2007, 13:56:22 UTC
I'm doing it sometime next week! I have another book lined up to recap before then, though...

Reply

moonspinner November 5 2007, 14:10:33 UTC
Awesome! :D

Reply

leah1878 November 5 2007, 18:35:55 UTC
:) Good!

Reply


dirtywingsgirl November 5 2007, 14:07:05 UTC
I love how in both this and in the Wakefield saga, a guy falls in love with a black ex-slave/woman, but the black woman dies tragically, and the guys marry other people. It's as if to say, "Look! The Wakefield and Patman ancestors were so nice and brave and equality-minded - they fell in love with black people!" But of course, they couldn't have married them and had kids with them, cos Jess, Liz and Bruce can't have black ancestors. What would the neighbors think??

Reply

leah1878 November 5 2007, 18:39:44 UTC
Haha, I know, why even have that as a plot point then if they're just going to die a randomly horrible death?

Reply


versipellis November 5 2007, 21:32:57 UTC
I was really traumatised by Hope's death and all the miscarriages in this. It's pretty depressing really. Nice recap though!

Reply

leah1878 November 7 2007, 03:14:22 UTC
Thank you! I know, it's like no couple except Reginald/May and Hank/Marie are allowed to be happy for more then a couple of years, because of course someone always has to die/miscarry a baby/end up murdered.

Reply


moonspinner November 6 2007, 12:51:06 UTC
I went to re-read bruce's story and I giggled when I realized that Grandfather Alexander Patman who made all the Patman money isn't even in the Saga. :p

Reply

leah1878 November 7 2007, 03:15:44 UTC
:) The continuity in Sweet Valley is so bad.

Reply

esc_key November 7 2007, 21:22:48 UTC
I think Alexander was like the secret Patman they kept in the attic (that's why he's so grouchy) and then he took over the company and made millions (because he's a jerk and jerks are good at running companies).

But "Lila's Story" did say the Patman's were "old" money so this, in it's crazy way, actually makes more sense?

Reply

moonspinner November 8 2007, 06:18:11 UTC
Of course, it does. :p Besides, why would Reginald I-was-switched-at-birth-for-the-pauper Patman be so money eccentric?

OK, I just answered that question. :p

Reply


Leave a comment

Up