Thanks for all of your corrections!
Some corrections require a bit more input. If you were the nominator, or are closely involved in the fandom, could you please comment on the following questions by 9pm UTC 30th Sept
(When is this for me?):
Don Carlos - Friedrich Schiller / Don Carlos | Don Carlo - Verdi/du Locle/Méry
It’s possible that these
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
If you go with splitting, maybe "original movie timeline" and "Genisys"? And Salvation if the nominator wants that one split out too. Either way, I'd prefer if my nominations for John, Kate, and Enrique are all under the original movie timeline.
If you go with disambiguation tags, then John, Sarah, and Kyle are the only characters who should need disambiguation. Would "John Connor (T2/T3/Salvation)" work?
And I don't know which versions of Sarah and Kyle were nominated, but it would be either Sarah Connor (T1/T2), Sarah Connor (Genisys), Kyle Reese (T1), Kyle Reese (Salvation), or Kyle Reese (Genisys).
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
1) Each character is considered one character, across all parts of the franchise; e.g., Sarah Connor is one tag, regardless of whether you're referring to the version in one timeline played by Linda Hamilton or the one in another timeline played by Emilia Clark. This is how AO3 treats the characters. And, personally, this is how I've always seen the characters in that 'verse, because isn't that sort of the point of having multiple timelines with the same core people ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Don't get me wrong, I'll write for the fandom no matter what. That's just my take!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I realise you have been arguing all along that they are the same character, and I see logic in your argument, but this split seems to please the greatest number of nominators this year.
However, if you have a preference about where you want Kyle to go (currently, John and Sarah appear both places, and Pops of course can only fit either "Genisys" or "all movies"), we'd be happy to accommodate you.
Reply
Leave a comment