Comments | yeah_itsme: the curious incident of Gardener in the night-time

yeah_itsme

the curious incident of Gardener in the night-time

Jan 17, 2005 07:54

i knew it ( Read more... )

Comments 8

*sigh* ditto... endymion4 January 18 2005, 21:11:38 UTC

First of all: Don't hurt me.

Second: I agree that he should have been more autistic (i.e. avoid eyes, etc.), but he did portray it very well, and in all honesty, better than I think I could have done. As for emotional ambiguity...well, if he'd done the other character's emotions from the autism perspective, it would have been difficult for people who hadn't read the book to understand.

"Artistic Liberty"?

Re: *sigh* ditto... yeah_itsme January 19 2005, 18:34:20 UTC

do you mean artistic license?
and what does that have to do with anything?

wait..don't answer that. really. i don't want this to turn into another pointless conversation.

Re: *sigh* ditto... endymion4 January 19 2005, 20:43:17 UTC

It's not pointless, at least it's not intended to be. Yes, artistic licence. He changed some stuff to make it better for a Prose. That's all I was saying.

Okay. Now, you can drop it.

*double-take* endymion4 January 18 2005, 21:12:41 UTC

Wait a sec...Chelsea showing perception/ideas/emotion on her LIVEJOURNAL?!

Dude...

Re: *double-take* yeah_itsme January 19 2005, 18:32:38 UTC

and the LONG post. don't forget to include that in the list of unusual things

Re: *double-take* endymion4 January 19 2005, 20:50:36 UTC

Yeah, most of your posts are just long enough to express a single, fleeting thought that may or may not be coherent, depending on when you posted it an how awake you were.

I'm being honest, not mean.

Re: *double-take* yeah_itsme January 19 2005, 21:06:11 UTC

silly malvolio. i don't take that as being mean and i know it's true.

so don't fret

Thread 5