Originally published at
Tom Pollock. Please leave any
comments there.
Warning: SPOILERS for ‘Dr Who: A Good Man Goes to War’
Everyone loves a twisty tale, right? Everyone loves to have their expectations of a story go up in flames, incinerated by a brighter, shinier, more profound realization. It’s one of the greatest pleasures to be found in fiction.
Others have, and will continue, to deconstruct the plot mechanics of the Dr Who Mid-series Finale ‘A Good Man Goes to War’. Including the various twists and reversals that have become a Dr Who staple in the Moffatt era.
One of those twists, I thought was particularly well executed - The Doctor and Rory and all of their friends infiltrate and take over an asteroid base to recover Amy and her baby, only to discover that the baby is another Flesh clone.
It has everything you’d want from a twist: it’s simple, elegant, well timed and relies only on story elements we’re already familiar with. Great twist. No really. Great.
My question is simple: why didn’t I care more?
I think the reason is that stated above. Moffatt includes so many twists that it’s hard to be surprised at the surprises. It’s not that I guessed it beforehand, far from it. But deep down I had an inkling that something was coming, after all, this is the Steven Moffatt Dr Who we’re talking about! I’ve kind of built up a tolerance to his twists. As with Alias I can’t go back to the time I naively trusted it.
This idea fits with the trend that the stories famous for having great twists (The Sixth Sense, Fight Club, The Usual Supects etc.) all seem to have one thing in common, they each only really have one. They set off the dynamite and really blow your expectations out from under you, and they do it before you realise you can’t trust them.
What do you guys think? Do you like your dramas to be a rollercoaster ride of confounded expectation? Or do you like them to save it all for one really big shock?