In defense of Grigori Grabovoi. About repentance, slander and the law
It is impossible to believe that this cute young lady with a Russian name Tatyana lies so impudently in an OPEN STUDIO so that people believe that Grigori Grabovoi must repent. What should he repent of? We have already heard in two stories that he was not in Beslan and, all the more, he did not take money from Beslan's mothers - Vorsobin confirmed all this. In the verdict, there is no charge for Beslan. In addition to the journalist Vorsobin with a painted portrait, there were no other victims at that time ...
So what should Grigori Grabovoi repent of?!!
Now we will consider the contradiction of slander and law. For example, on May 25, 2010, Dvorkin gave an interview, and Tatyana Karpacheva, a guest of OPEN STUDIO, almost literally repeated his words.
Click to view- Tatyana Sergeevna! What is your attitude to this: a man has been corrected, he has been released.
- No, the person has certainly not been corrected, because the only condition for parole is voluntary repentance. It wasn’t.
[She is not even shy to put her opinion above the decision of the state court! And millions of viewers are listening to all this ...]
Natalya Shatikhina:
- No, it is not. He must not change his inner convictions. He must prove that he has embarked on the path of correction: that he will not commit acts. A person can still consider himself possessing some kind of supernatural abilities.
Nika Strizhak: "That is, the Second COMING of Christ must be left within himself..."
You can firmly stand on the letter of the law, understand the law and use this knowledge for a person, and not against his beliefs. What if it happens, as Nika Strizhak said, this person is right!
NATALYA SHATIKHINA!
Knowing the law, you do not need to allow yourself to insult people, because you simply may not know the essence of the problem or any of the laws of the evolutionary development of civilization.
This is regarding Grabovoi G.P. and his supporters.
INTERVIEW OF A.DVORKIN
- Alexander Leonidovich! How do you assess the court decision - was it objective?
- The decision of the court struck me very much. Because the basic principle of applying of parole (a conditional release) is a sincere repentance of a person, which gives a certain guarantee that he will no longer return to his previous criminal activity. And just at Grabovoi this element was completely absent ... (Alexander Leonidovich Dvorkin, May 25, 2010)
KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW LEADS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF LIES!!!
The law says that a person does not have to change his inner convictions on a conditional release, Natalya Shatikhina voices this in “Open Studio” to millions of viewers.
That is, even among outright lies and slander from, for example, Dvorkin (May 25, 2010) and Karpacheva (May 27, 2010), a person can find some grains of truth if, of course, he wants to hear them.
As you can see, at the Center for Religious Studies in the name of St. Irenaeus of Lyons, that is, at the center, including the fight against sects, employees do not follow the letter of the law, as is customary in the civilized world, and for millions of listeners and viewers they formulated their conditions of PAROLE.
The verdict of the Tagansky court of Moscow in relation to Grigori Grabovoi was completely based on the materials of an illegal comprehensive socio-psychological expertise. The expertise was made by such people whose opinion we heard and saw. This is a specific custom-made case, that is, an order that has not been canceled even today, analyzing ongoing broadcasts ... We just remember that there is no concept of sect in the law, and there are no charges in the verdict on Beslan.
Grigori Petrovich Grabovoi must be fully justified!
Antonina Kravtsova,
Moscow
Material Used: "Open Studio. Syndrome of Grabovoi", live broadcast, May 2010.