The Splitting of Infinities
Between each certainty is an infinite number of uncertainties.
Go from 0 to 1 and you have a certain step. Either whatever you are counting exists or it doesn't. And yet you can have half of an object, making it definitely there, but not all there. You could also have a fractional component beyond that which is very hard to define. An infinite number of possible amounts of existence of something exist beyond mere existence. Consider an apple. Either you have one or you don't. Take a bite out of it and now you have less than an apple in your hand. Thus the apple's true existence is less than what it use to be. It isn't all there.
The apple is now in two parts. The bit you bit and the bit you didn't. Each of these bits has a certainty of existence. Except the bit you bit is now being digested which changes the properties of the apple beyond separation. So if the properties of the apple are no longer true, does the existence of the apple change to be less real? At what point does the apple stop being an apple and become energy and or fertiliser?
Or looking at it a different way. If I were to create a gizmo that could take one in every hundred molecules away and point it at the apple, then the apple becomes lesser whilst still seeming to be all there. How many times do I zap it with the gizmo before we decide it is no longer an apple? This is kind of like sliding the fade bar on a picture, watching the true nature of the idea of an apple slide out of existence until it hits zero, where the apple ceases to exist.
Can I, part way through, press the reverse switch on my gizmo and put the apple back? Lets say I can. Each zap now puts the molecules back in the apple until it reaches one whole apple. What happens when I press the button again? Does it become more than real? Of reality can only hold things that are real, then where do more than real things go? How many times do I need to zap the gizmo before we decide that it is now so more than real that there are, in effect, two apples? Would this twoness be the equivalent of two apples, or would there become a point where two distinct apples actually exist, simply because the number of molecules has doubled? The reducer option did not decrease the space taken. Does the increaser option increase the space, or does it only increase the density?
Does the decreaer option merely seperate the apple into lots of different pieces (potentially a hundred), or does it slide the molecules into an alternate world, or just get rid of them entirely? If it gets rid of them, how does it bring them back when you switch to increaser? If it goes somewhere else, where does it go? Do all things that cease to exist go there?
And another point. If we know that zapping the item one hundred times reduces its existence to zero, then we know there are one hundred even molecules in it - creating a digital number of molecules. What happens if we then change the number of molecules to reduce the item by a third? This would take out 0.3333333 recurring molecules, requiring either the splitting of a molecule, or something deciding what was and what was not 1/3 of the molecules. (Unless, of course, there were an even number of molecules that can be split by both 100 and 3, in this case assume not.) If the device were to reduce by the nearest whole number under the fraction solution of molecules, does the final resultant after three zaps remain apple? Or is it now something else?
What if the zaps only take away one in a hundred molecules of the item zapped, rather than one in a hundred of the total item? How many zaps does it require before the item stops being that item? Is the world digital or analogue?
If molecules exists in a physical space particulate manner, then their number is whole and can be expressed digitally, meaning that splitting a molecule changes it's nature and stops it being the same thing that it was before. If, on the other hand, molecules are merely areas of particular types of energy, then perhaps the energy can continually be reduced without changing the nature of the energy. Consider a red brick. Halve the brick enough times and you end up with a single brick molecule. Split the brick molecule and you end up with component atoms. Split the atom and you get a big kaboom and lots of energy. Can you now split the energy? But half here, and half there. How many times can you split the energy before you get another kaboom? Or does it just fade out to nothing? Can it?
The brick is a thing - it has mass and space. The red in a brick does not. It has no space, it has no mass. One could argue that the red is a frequency of photons generated by spinning electrons reacting to other photons hitting it - that is reflection. And the frequency of this photon as it shoots through the matrix of ether is what defines it colour. And photons have mass. Great. So what part of the photon makes it look red in my head? Where does that colour come from? Not the photon. It's just a packet of information in the form of energy, measured in speed, vibration and impact. Can you split the photon? What does it look like?
You can split the brick. The brick has mass. Can you split the red? Red has no mass. Red is an idea of colour which may or may not look the same in your head as it does in mine. If you take half the red away, does the colour change, and if so in what way? If it doesn't, can you keep taking colour away and end up with an infinite amount of red from an initial finite quantity?
Nature seems to abhor a vacuum. It likes to fill it with stuff. If it can't fill it with matter, it zings energy into it. If it can't fill zing energy into it, then it creates energy within it so there is always something there. The energy then destroys itself so as not to create an imbalance (the energy created is both positive and negative, clashing to oblivion). Otherwise the universe would just keep filling up. Ok, that's zero point energy taken care of in a very brief way. How small does the space have to be before nature decides to fill it? What is the smallest point of non-existence before existence become spontaneous? Where does that energy come from anyhow? And why?
Can people super exist? Is this why some people are hard to notice and others hard to forget? How do I find out what my existence level is? Is it better to super exist or to live? How do I find out my live level?
Have I broken anyone who has bothered to read all this?
Go from 0 to 1 and you have a certain step. Either whatever you are counting exists or it doesn't. And yet you can have half of an object, making it definitely there, but not all there. You could also have a fractional component beyond that which is very hard to define. An infinite number of possible amounts of existence of something exist beyond mere existence. Consider an apple. Either you have one or you don't. Take a bite out of it and now you have less than an apple in your hand. Thus the apple's true existence is less than what it use to be. It isn't all there.
The apple is now in two parts. The bit you bit and the bit you didn't. Each of these bits has a certainty of existence. Except the bit you bit is now being digested which changes the properties of the apple beyond separation. So if the properties of the apple are no longer true, does the existence of the apple change to be less real? At what point does the apple stop being an apple and become energy and or fertiliser?
Or looking at it a different way. If I were to create a gizmo that could take one in every hundred molecules away and point it at the apple, then the apple becomes lesser whilst still seeming to be all there. How many times do I zap it with the gizmo before we decide it is no longer an apple? This is kind of like sliding the fade bar on a picture, watching the true nature of the idea of an apple slide out of existence until it hits zero, where the apple ceases to exist.
Can I, part way through, press the reverse switch on my gizmo and put the apple back? Lets say I can. Each zap now puts the molecules back in the apple until it reaches one whole apple. What happens when I press the button again? Does it become more than real? Of reality can only hold things that are real, then where do more than real things go? How many times do I need to zap the gizmo before we decide that it is now so more than real that there are, in effect, two apples? Would this twoness be the equivalent of two apples, or would there become a point where two distinct apples actually exist, simply because the number of molecules has doubled? The reducer option did not decrease the space taken. Does the increaser option increase the space, or does it only increase the density?
Does the decreaer option merely seperate the apple into lots of different pieces (potentially a hundred), or does it slide the molecules into an alternate world, or just get rid of them entirely? If it gets rid of them, how does it bring them back when you switch to increaser? If it goes somewhere else, where does it go? Do all things that cease to exist go there?
And another point. If we know that zapping the item one hundred times reduces its existence to zero, then we know there are one hundred even molecules in it - creating a digital number of molecules. What happens if we then change the number of molecules to reduce the item by a third? This would take out 0.3333333 recurring molecules, requiring either the splitting of a molecule, or something deciding what was and what was not 1/3 of the molecules. (Unless, of course, there were an even number of molecules that can be split by both 100 and 3, in this case assume not.) If the device were to reduce by the nearest whole number under the fraction solution of molecules, does the final resultant after three zaps remain apple? Or is it now something else?
What if the zaps only take away one in a hundred molecules of the item zapped, rather than one in a hundred of the total item? How many zaps does it require before the item stops being that item? Is the world digital or analogue?
If molecules exists in a physical space particulate manner, then their number is whole and can be expressed digitally, meaning that splitting a molecule changes it's nature and stops it being the same thing that it was before. If, on the other hand, molecules are merely areas of particular types of energy, then perhaps the energy can continually be reduced without changing the nature of the energy. Consider a red brick. Halve the brick enough times and you end up with a single brick molecule. Split the brick molecule and you end up with component atoms. Split the atom and you get a big kaboom and lots of energy. Can you now split the energy? But half here, and half there. How many times can you split the energy before you get another kaboom? Or does it just fade out to nothing? Can it?
The brick is a thing - it has mass and space. The red in a brick does not. It has no space, it has no mass. One could argue that the red is a frequency of photons generated by spinning electrons reacting to other photons hitting it - that is reflection. And the frequency of this photon as it shoots through the matrix of ether is what defines it colour. And photons have mass. Great. So what part of the photon makes it look red in my head? Where does that colour come from? Not the photon. It's just a packet of information in the form of energy, measured in speed, vibration and impact. Can you split the photon? What does it look like?
You can split the brick. The brick has mass. Can you split the red? Red has no mass. Red is an idea of colour which may or may not look the same in your head as it does in mine. If you take half the red away, does the colour change, and if so in what way? If it doesn't, can you keep taking colour away and end up with an infinite amount of red from an initial finite quantity?
Nature seems to abhor a vacuum. It likes to fill it with stuff. If it can't fill it with matter, it zings energy into it. If it can't fill zing energy into it, then it creates energy within it so there is always something there. The energy then destroys itself so as not to create an imbalance (the energy created is both positive and negative, clashing to oblivion). Otherwise the universe would just keep filling up. Ok, that's zero point energy taken care of in a very brief way. How small does the space have to be before nature decides to fill it? What is the smallest point of non-existence before existence become spontaneous? Where does that energy come from anyhow? And why?
Can people super exist? Is this why some people are hard to notice and others hard to forget? How do I find out what my existence level is? Is it better to super exist or to live? How do I find out my live level?
Have I broken anyone who has bothered to read all this?