(An e-mail I received).

Jul 31, 2003 21:16

Three men were competing to see who was the worst one in the world ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 17

mot July 31 2003, 21:51:22 UTC
I just have to tell you, that's the shiznit. And that's going in my profile.

Reply


perfectpen July 31 2003, 22:30:09 UTC
Wow. Very insightful.

Reply


trepanaut July 31 2003, 22:47:14 UTC
I'd say the first man wins the title for having the cruelty to instigate the contest.

Reply

under_glass August 1 2003, 04:54:37 UTC
yes, but how many years did it take before anyone cared to stop him?

Reply

trepanaut August 1 2003, 14:51:59 UTC
I was just talking about the allegory. I don't think it's a valid metaphor for international relations.

Reply

under_glass August 1 2003, 14:55:47 UTC
i didn't write it.. you'd have to take that up with whomever did.

Reply


thedeesman August 1 2003, 01:42:09 UTC
ooh, neat. I really liked that.

Reply


angeldustsky August 1 2003, 05:40:02 UTC
alright, so the west is considered to have "raped" Iraq because they freed them of a dictator? it's very interesting how anti-war-ists twist things around.

Reply

under_glass August 1 2003, 10:03:43 UTC
bush didn't, and doesn't, give a shit what happens to the iraqi people. he wasn't primarily interested in "freeing them of a dictator," because that could have been accomplished without obliterating innocent civilians.

they never found the "weapons of mass destruction," so i suppose he had to say something in order to justify his actions.

Reply

rollercoaster14 August 1 2003, 12:13:40 UTC
that's a cool little....you know, metaphor.

you should come with us sometime to one of our anti war activist events.

Reply

Wait trepanaut August 1 2003, 14:58:27 UTC
"he wasn't primarily interested in 'freeing them of a dictator,' because that could have been accomplished without obliterating innocent civilians."

How?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up