Im super smart.

Jul 20, 2005 15:19

Sarah Walsh
7-13-05
Paper #2
ESP 300

In learning briefly about Subcomandante Marcos and the Zapatistas of Chiapas,

Mexico, it came to my awareness that something for the greater good was going on in

this part of Latin America. Not only are these people part of a five hundred year quest to

stop repression and exploitation of Indigenous peoples of Mexico, these people are also

strong and willing to do whatever it takes to gain their rights back and the land that as

human beings deserve. No corporation or global conglomerate industry has the right to

kick people off of its land just because it feels like building a Wal-Mart in that specific

area, or in any case, has no right to kick the people off of their land to take natural

resources.

First, we’ll start off with some background on which this leader Subcomandante

Marcos is. Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos is the leading spokesman for the EZLN

otherwise known as the Zapatista Army of National Liberation. According to the

government in Mexico, Subcomandante Marcos’ real name is Rafael Guillen. He was a

man with an education where he graduated from college and also taught with a Masters

degree in Philosophy at the University of Mexico.

After this, he left to join the Zapatistas as a revolutionary. In 2001, Marcos made

his speech at the University of Mexico during the Great March to Mexico City. Like

many, he became somewhat of an activist into all of the events that 1968 had brought

about in the world. This led him to become a part of the Maoist organization. Having

Maoist ideas in short express this specific reasoning: “A key concept that distinguishes

Maoism from other left-wing ideologies is the belief that the class struggle continues

throughout the entire socialist period (between capitalism and communism)…

Maoism emphasizes revolutionary mass mobilization…” (2 Maosim). Maoism also

emphasizes that peasants can be mobilized to create the “people’s war” and by

arming them to engage in guerilla warfare. This can in part be paired up with

Communism, but doesn’t fully entail that that’s what needs to happen. Because in

the book “Our Word is Our Weapon” Subcomandante Marcos states that he loves

democracy and there is no need for people to think they are fighting for a cause

other than what they have the right to do. He is implying that people who peasants

are fighting for land rights are not fighting in favor of communism exactly, but in

favor of a tried and true fair democracy. Something Mexico really has never seen,

not only in Chiapas, but all over the country.

Let us backtrack to the EZLN. The EZLN claims to represent the rights of the

indigenous peoples of Mexico. It is part of an anti-capitalist movement, but fighting

for democracy, peace and justice for all Mexicans and all oppressed people. This

group of people took its name from a passed Mexican revolutionary leader named

Emiliano Zapata. He fought in basic guerilla operations before and after the Mexican

revolution in 1911-17. The Zapatistas are trying to fight off 500 years worth of

indigenous persecution.

These revolutionaries are trying to dissuade each other from using any form

of weapons. Only in time of special need would they use such. Of course, they carry

the AK-47’s slung over their shoulders, but they try to use non-violence as the main

tactic of ending the peoples struggle. The march to Mexico City, in itself was a

peaceful march, without the presence of any weapons on hand. This group was

formed on November 17, 1983.

“They broke into the national and international scene on January 2, 1994, just

one day after the North American Free Trade Agreement...” (2 History). They finally

declared war against the Mexican government and announced their plans to march

towards Mexico City. With talks extending over three years between the President

Carlos Salinas de Gortari and Sub. Marcos finalized with the San Andres Agreement.

This was supposed to entail special rights (autonomy to indigenous peoples) by

modifying their constitution. This didn’t happen of course. When President Zedillo

said Congress had to decide the fate of this article (pass or no pass), the Zapatistas

had to go back to their old routine again until an unofficial truce was made for the

last 3 years of Zedillo’s term.

When people accused the army and paramilitary death squads of holding

Zapatistas or unlawfully prosecuting them, it led to Massacre of Acteal, where 45

people were massacred during a church mass. Many blame the army for this terrible

atrocity.

One thing that describes this scenario into perfect words would be something

Subcomandante Marcos said at the First Intercontinental Encuentro for Humanity

against Neoliberalism, “We were silenced. We were faceless. We were nameless. We

had no future. We did not exist... We were a cipher in the accounts of big capital…

We are you. Behind is, you are us. Behind our masks is the face of all excluded

women, Of all the forgotten indigenous, Of all the persecuted homosexuals, of all the

despised youth, Of all the beaten migrants, Of all those imprisoned for their words

and thoughts, Of all the humiliated workers, Of all those who died from neglect, Of

all the simple and ordinary men and women, Who don’t count, Who aren’t seen, Who

are nameless, Who have no tomorrow” (104 Our Word..).

For years this went on, and still goes on even today. This is what the

Zapatistas do. They fight for the rights of the people who deserve it. To track to

more present times, in 2003, Marcos and the Zapatistas sent “comunicados”

describing how Autonomous Municipalities (that have been gradually forming since

1994), have developed local governments or “juntas”, communitarian food-producing

programs among the indigenous peasants and free health care and school systems,

supported by the non-governmental organizations independent of government based

ones that never really paid attention to the people in the first place.

These Zapatistas communicated as well by satellite phones and the internet.

Sometimes even in the jungle, they communicate by CB radio. Chiapas, where the

EZLN are located, is very rich in terms of naturally resources especially petroleum

and electricity. “Chiapas also bleeds coffee. Thirty-five percent of the coffee

produced in Mexico comes from this area. The industry employs 87,000 people. 47%

is for the national consumption, and 53% is exported abroad, mainly in the US and

Europe. More than 100,000 tons of coffee is taken from this state to fatten the

beast’s bank accounts: in 1988 a kilo of pergamino coffee was sold abroad for 8,000

pesos. The Chiapaneco producers were paid 2,500 pesos or less” (23 Our Word).

Not only is coffee a main staple, but so is beef. People are kicked off their

land just so a foreign industry can take exports from Mexico to produce the beef.

Wood is also yet another source of money to fill the capitalists pocket and leave the

workers poor and the earth destroyed. Also, honey and corn are two of the other

main things that are being taken away from the Mexican population for profit.

This is why the EZLN fights for the rights of Mexicans. The US may have seen

this as Communism at one point, maybe it still does. The Mexican government also is

afraid they might be over thrown, but in the video about “Land of Plenty Full of Poor

People” he states that that isn’t the case. They just want the basic rights people deserve.

“In the past 10 years more than 150,000 indigenous have died of curable diseases” (17

Our Word). This shouldn’t have been the case, and it wouldn’t have been if they had

basic rights.

In the famous words of Emiliano Zapata in 1914,” It is not only by shooting

bullets in the battlefields that tyranny is overthrown, but also by hurling ideas of

redemption, words of freedom and terrible anathemas against the hangmen that people

bring down dictators and empires...” In this case, he was right. His people are leading a

revolution against their oppressors. This struggle will continue, until they are finally free

of thinking of life more as a burden, rather than as a gift.
Previous post Next post
Up