In What's The Matter With Kansas?, Thomas Frank, a native Kansan, tries
to answer the question of why Americans often vote against their own economic
interests.
Thomas Frank uses the example of Kansas, given his local knowledge and
the fact that Kansa used to be a hotbed of political radicalism.Who
knew, I didn't.
The whole premise of the book I get. Why do a lot of Americans vote in
conservative{ i.e. Republican} candidates, who then push through tax
cuts that primarily benefit the rich, the historical base of the
Republican Party.
Frank's theory is that the Republican Party has taken a rather sharpe
turn to the right{which I understand} and has gained millions of voters
as a result. By picking wedge issues {as it is termed} the Republican
Party has been able to cleave away Democratic supporters, while still
supporting the base interests of fiscal conservatism.
I personally find the American usage of fiscal conservatism to be
kind of funny. In Canada it seems to mean less about voting in tax cuts
and cost cutting, and more about not spending more than you take-in in
revenue. Another funny American usage. Liberal. In Canada, Liberal
{big-L} is the natural ruling party, and liberal {small-l} are people
of left-leaning persuasion. In the US, liberals are people who want to
destroy America. As Frank points out not since Walter Modale {Who?} has
there been a leading presidential candidate who has called him/herself
a liberal.
In examining this question, Frank looks at battles within the
Republican Party itself, where moderate republicans {In Canada they
would be Red Tories} are pushed out in favour of even more right
winged candidates. These people are able to do this because they pick
wedge issues {abortion, gay marriage, guns, i.e. the usual} to elect
themselves to office, where they then vote in massive tax cuts. All
without really accomplishing anything regarding their social
conservative agenda.
These people then keep doing this by keeping the fires of outrage
burning. Frank points out how these conservatives hit on new and
generally unimportant issues, gay marriage being one, to keep the
outrage against the Liberal establishment {which Frank says does not
exist} burning. When I got to that part of the book I couldn't help but
agree with that conclusion given the recent Sciavo case with all these
conservatives jumping on the "culture of life" band wagon for a case
that should not have garnered so much federal attention.
As for the Republican Party stalwarts i.e. rich people, they don't mind
this new game as the new conservatives still keep voting them tax cuts.
Then there's the Democratic Party which, according to Frank, has really
dropped the ball, and has transformed itself to the other business
friendly party, which just leaves social issues to distinguish the parties, and this is where the Republicans are winning.
In general, Thomas Frank makes his biases known, and writes with a
humourous and at times ironic tune. Whether you agree with his
conclusions or not, he does make a strong argument and What's The
Matter With Kansas? would be well worth reading for those of left or
right leaning persuasions. Then again, maybe not for those of right
leaning persuasions.
8.0/10