John Keegan. The first and last word when it comes to military history.
When other historians write about war, I would be very surprised if
they do not mention or reference John Keegan.
Another great thing about John Keegan is he is British. This means he
remembers to throw a bone to the other members of the Commonwealth,
where applicable. I recall in one history of the First World War, the
{American} author mentioned Sir Arthur Currie as an example of a fat
general who was not worthless in that capacity. In Six Armies in
Normandy, Canada merits a whole chapter. This is important as Canadians
ignore, forget or otherwise write ourselves out of our own history.
As for the content of Six Armies in Normandy I do have some
reservation. As an account, John Keegan, paints very broad brush
strokes of the
participants and the operations. So while he makes a point {as the
title suggests} to hit on the major nations involved, he doesn't get
into any great detail or depth about what's going on in Normandy. He
also makes a point a point to hit on the major parts of the Normandy
operations. The Airborne assault, the sea landings, the infantry
fighting, the tank battles etc... though again, he does not get into a
hyper detailed account.
He also hits on some of the lesser known participants. Canada and even
more unknown to posterity, were the divisions of Polish troops that in
fact played a pivotal part in closing the Fallaise Gap.
In general, Six Armies in Normandy is a concise and well written,
account that would probably satisfy the mildly interested and not bore
the overly interested.
8.0/10