Comments | thoughtformed: Who needs subtlety when you've got style?

antipatriarchy in thoughtformed

Who needs subtlety when you've got style?

Jan 17, 2011 20:01

HEY, NEWS GUY.

Thanks for the article. I liked the coverage, and the fear you showed. Really covering your job, aren't you?

By the way, for who's watching: The name's Red Hood. Red Hood. Don't forget it.

Except that cute little bird here. Bet you've been looking for me, haven't you?

yoite, victor mancha, jason todd, yukimi kazuhiko, shirogane naoto, meguro gau, tim drake, lau, shimizu raikou

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

expositional January 18 2011, 04:02:50 UTC

Yes, several of us are familiar with your name. However it seems the paper in question objected to printing it.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:11:50 UTC

Can't figure out why that happened. Can you?

expositional January 18 2011, 04:13:57 UTC

Naturally, I have several theories. To be honest, it's not a difficult question.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:14:45 UTC

I figured a fine detective such as you would have more solid facts by now. There isn't a whole lot to work with here.

expositional January 18 2011, 04:18:28 UTC

His report had no connection to our offices, so don't confuse his ignorance with that of the police.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:20:48 UTC

I was talking about your theories.

Tell me this: Why do you think I'm doing all this, Detective Shirogane?

expositional January 18 2011, 04:25:06 UTC

Why? Have you forgotten your own motives?

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:25:52 UTC

Clever. What a way to show that you either don't have a damn clue, or you don't wanna let me in on the fact that you're on to me.

expositional January 18 2011, 04:28:46 UTC

The third option is that even as an independent investigator, I am currently under a binding non-disclosure contract with the New Moore police department.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:30:02 UTC

Heh, it's always door number three.

expositional January 18 2011, 04:33:26 UTC

However, I don't believe I will be working on this particular case for much longer. I'm sure the details of my work will be made clear to you after you've been apprehended.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 04:40:48 UTC

That's not on my agenda, I'm sorry to say.

expositional January 18 2011, 06:18:37 UTC

Since you've decided to present yourself to the general public, it's at the top of mine.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 16:11:53 UTC

It's a good thing they've got someone so faithful to the law to use like a watch dog. One day when you realize you're nothing but a tool to them, let's have another talk.

expositional January 18 2011, 16:21:09 UTC

When I catch you it will be for the good of the general public, not for my employers.

antipatriarchy January 18 2011, 16:24:27 UTC

Right.

You don't have two legs to stand on, you know that?

Back to all threads