London Mayoral elections

Apr 30, 2008 11:42

Hadn't appreciated until this weekend that the Mayoral election doesn't automatically count second-choice votes for the top two candidates and add them to first-choice votes. It only does this if no candidate gets 50% of first-choice votes ( Read more... )

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 8

ciphergoth April 30 2008, 11:03:36 UTC
Actually the difference you've noticed doesn't really make a difference. If Boris gets over 50% of the vote, he'll still win whether or not second preference votes are counted.

Believe me, if it made a difference whether Ken was your first or second choice I'd be shouting it from the rooftops. So long as Ken is on your ballot and Boris isn't, you're doing your bit to stop Boris.

Reply

djm4 April 30 2008, 11:10:12 UTC
What he said. If Boris gets over 50% of the first preference votes, he's got over 50% of the votes no matter how you split the other votes, and he's won. It means that if *everyone* voted Ken as first preference, he'd still only have less than 50% of the total vote.

Reply

thekumquat April 30 2008, 11:22:23 UTC
D'oh!

Reply


softfruit April 30 2008, 12:19:48 UTC
I find it easiest to think of the 2-vote system London uses for mayor as the First Vote Hope, Second Vote Fear electoral system.

Reply

haggis April 30 2008, 19:45:29 UTC
Two chances to say "Anyone but Boris?"

Reply


dr_jen May 4 2008, 20:20:36 UTC
Thank you for the mealtime company yesterday, ok to add you on lj?

Reply

thekumquat May 4 2008, 22:04:38 UTC
Yes, go ahead! I think I added you before and only deleted you when I forgot who you actually were...

Reply

dr_jen May 4 2008, 22:29:10 UTC
Thanks :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up