On Ancient Discoveries: China

May 13, 2010 23:09

Ok, you stupid show. Are we really going to do this again ( Read more... )

spqr, jersey shore-esque fail, his imperial highness, historically speaking

Leave a comment

Comments 26

bluegrasshopper May 14 2010, 02:17:00 UTC
while I am sure you are ENTIRELY correct, two notes:

1 - come on... you know better than to trust half of what Wikipedia says ;]
2 - well, ok, I agree. the Great and Wise Wizards of Time and Space would be the Timelords*

*obligatory Doctor Who reference... mwah ha ha...

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:03:25 UTC
Dr Who Fail.

Reply

bluegrasshopper May 14 2010, 03:15:34 UTC
the_epic fail =p

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:26:13 UTC
I want to love Dr. Who - but it's just become the Twilight of Sci Fi.

Reply


lightfromlight May 14 2010, 02:36:06 UTC
If you and fleurdelista ever need something to keep you from being bored, you can start a blog where you fact-check the History Channel. I'd read it.

Reply

fleurdelista May 14 2010, 02:58:36 UTC
This is actually a brilliant idea. But I'd be afraid of punting your brand new tv.

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:02:41 UTC
And I'd be afraid of trying to convince her to punt your brand new tv.

Reply

lightfromlight May 14 2010, 04:05:01 UTC
Yeah, you'd have to do that shit on your own TV. Or I could build a cage around it.

TV needs a name. Hmm.

Reply


alagbon May 14 2010, 02:51:37 UTC
Oh gods, are they spreading the absurd mistake that the Xiongnu were the same as the Huns? Just because the Sogdian term for the Xiongnu was pronounced more or less "khoon" doesn't mean these guys had diddly-squat to do with Attila and his bunch. (And the Xiongnu didn't amount to anything more than an annoyance for the Chinese, which is exactly why nobody is sure who exactly they were. But everyone who isn't a freakin' idiot knows that they most likely were not the same as the Huns!)

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:03:06 UTC
Oh historical inaccuracies.

Reply

alagbon May 14 2010, 03:16:42 UTC
Call themselves the "History Channel" and they perpetuate bullshit that the legitimate academic world stopped believing before freakin' WWII! Bah.

Reply


raphsody606 May 14 2010, 03:14:39 UTC
While they didn't use the term barbarians they certainty treated outsiders badly/differently.

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:25:42 UTC
Of course!

But they didn't call anyone "barbarians."

Reply

raphsody606 May 14 2010, 03:41:48 UTC
Heavens no. Chinese equivalent thereof - yes.

Reply

the_epic May 14 2010, 03:43:15 UTC
I'm sure they did.
I'm complaining about the word useage.

Reply


ex_hellocth126 May 14 2010, 04:09:20 UTC
It's the same sort of Asia-philia (there's probably an official term for that) that leads to people proclaiming that samurai with their almighty katanas are history's ultimate warriors.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up