Jun 10, 2007 14:44
Hey, its time for another movie review by me.
This week, its "28 Weeks Later" the sequel to "28 Days Later". I would give 8/10 on my scale. As much as it is a sequel, the only elements that made it so are the disease. The "Rage" virus is the same, but other than that there's not much that's the same. Of course, it happens in London/mainland Britain. Even having re-watched 28 Days Later a few days before, I was a little confused at the beginning. They seemed to have gone back in time a little while from the end of "Days" to the beginning of "Weeks", but once I established that, I was fine. There were a few other times in the movie that it was confusing, though that was mostly because it was dark and I couldn't tell what was going on. To other people, this could have contributed to the movie, but not me. I also thought the directors made use of the Hand Cam too much. I don't like not being able to tell what is going on in the movie. Maybe I'm just a spoil-sport, but I don't like the shaky-ness of a hand-cam. I like to be able to see what's going on. Either way, fairly good movie, but don't see it if you haven't seen "Days". Actually, its probably out of theatres at this point.