well, killing them for food is alright with me. but experimenting and exploiting? not really. But do I think that testing on a couple of animals to the save the human race is a valid reason to do it? yes. It depends, but my general answer is NO.
I always thought that eating animals was normal. Hell all animals do it. I don't think that's exploiting. But slavery is. Just replace a pet with a person, and it's very immoral. Most people treat their pets right, and some don't. but that's beside the point. Helping animals is not owning them. In other words, yes animals should roam free, but you can hunt (I use the term loosely) for them for food.
Of course, this entry is half serious and most of the laws are pet peeves, but I do feel a little bad that i have a rabbit here that doesn't understand half things that's around him. it's like 'he's not suppose to be here'? 'Why can't he have friends?'. 'Why can't he roam free in the forrest?'.
And 'why do I have the rabbit here'? well, because it's Angie's.
It's just something that I personally believe in, but I know i'm in a small minority.
Click to view
I always thought that eating animals was normal. Hell all animals do it. I don't think that's exploiting. But slavery is. Just replace a pet with a person, and it's very immoral. Most people treat their pets right, and some don't. but that's beside the point. Helping animals is not owning them.
In other words, yes animals should roam free, but you can hunt (I use the term loosely) for them for food.
Of course, this entry is half serious and most of the laws are pet peeves, but I do feel a little bad that i have a rabbit here that doesn't understand half things that's around him. it's like 'he's not suppose to be here'? 'Why can't he have friends?'. 'Why can't he roam free in the forrest?'.
And 'why do I have the rabbit here'? well, because it's Angie's.
It's just something that I personally believe in, but I know i'm in a small minority.
Reply
Leave a comment