North and South in Five Minutes

Mar 28, 2010 17:54

So last year I watched the BBC Miniseries North and South based on sihaya09's recommendation. It was a lovely series. Today I finished reading the book (it's up free on Gutenberg and good for kindle reading, other than some minor typos, such as 'lust' for 'just' throughout the etext, such that one character or another was always being described as a 'fair ( Read more... )

public, books

Leave a comment

I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama eilonwy March 28 2010, 22:21:35 UTC
BWAHAAA. This is triply funny because I have seen the miniseries (um... several times... and now own ... because I am lurrrve with Richard Armitage) and I am in the middle of the book. (Real life and trashier novels keep getting in the way, not to mention it's a library hardcover, and too hard to hold on the elliptical. Someday, a Kindle.) And good grief the oedipal complex of Mrs Thornton/Mr Thornton, ew. And I think that Dixon was totally in loooove with Mrs Hale.

ALSO, totally and completely unrelated and you may already have seen it but when I saw it I knew you had to see it (got that?) -- "Re: Your Brains" in Zombie Sign Language. (I always think of you when I hear this song-- heh-- because you introduced me to it.)

Oh crud. Now I have a zombie/North & South mashup in my head...

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 28 2010, 22:32:09 UTC
The book is evidence that people in the past had better attention spans than we do now. There were lots of times I was so deep in the sub-clauses that I no longer had any idea what what going on or where the paragraph had started out.

Mrs. Thornton was an interesting character. The book was full of scenes:

Mr. Thornton: The Hales have been very good to us as friends. Mother, I would appreciate it if you would show them some kindness-
Mrs. Thornton: Only for your sake! Only every for your sake! I will do my best!
Mr. Thornton: Good. I think they are not happy enough.
Mrs. Thornton: Ungrateful, demanding, selfish, horrible people! I hate them!

I agree on the Dixon repressed feelings vibe. The mini-series did a great job of softening all the characters a lot and giving them some more warmth and kindness. And yeah, Richard Armitage smoldered just wonderfully. I don't think he smiled until the last scene, and I've watched that a few times.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama gsh March 28 2010, 22:42:11 UTC
it doesn't help that every time you write "I hate them" my hind brain fills in "my precious".

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 28 2010, 22:43:52 UTC
Gollum never wore a corset*

*I don't recommend googling that to confirm.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama gsh March 28 2010, 23:00:36 UTC
By the laws of Quantum Fetish Dynamics there are now at least five websites about that.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 28 2010, 23:32:46 UTC
Which is why one should not look.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama eilonwy March 28 2010, 22:49:18 UTC
That last scene is just so... ::swoons:: yeah... ::fans self::

In your write up you quite rightly point out that the two of them fall for each other with very little (meaningful) interaction. And while the BBC version hasn't changed a *whole* lot (at least not in the first half of the book), they still managed to make their feelings for each other make sense. Granted, that's at least partly because of genre expectations, but still.

Between that and the first season of the BBC Robin Hood, when I got to watch season 7 of MI-5 it was quite a shock to see Richard Armitage in modern clothing... He pulled off brooding, intense costume drama hero *so* well.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 28 2010, 23:00:18 UTC
Well romances are not generally known for people sitting down and having reasonable conversations to clear up misunderstandings. Plus there's just this entire weird pervading concept that it would be rude to be clear about what's going on, or that you can't be both clear and polite.

I like a lot of these stories, but I find a lot of the details frustrating and weird, and chaffing as a female. All of the 'I wouldn't go there without a servant' and 'A lady wouldn't be seen with a man at that hour'. The worst in North and South, to me, was "women don't attend funerals because they become hysterical". Just- I am so glad to live in this part of the world and at this time, for all the faults it often has.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama vito_excalibur March 28 2010, 23:06:33 UTC
I wouldn't go there without a servant

Inorite? All those stupid, illogical constraints. And I know we still have them, but honestly, we have fewer.

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 28 2010, 23:45:15 UTC
North and South pissed me off about it all right at the start, when Mr. Hale decides he's having a crisis of faith (I think he was just depressed all the time) and needs to leave the clergy. Which is something he didn't feel he ought to discuss with his wife, and which meant that they were all going to lose their home and livelihood and get dragged off to another country.

Seriosuly. Counseling, anti-depressants, and reasonable divorce laws would have helped so much.

Reply

kayselkiemoon March 29 2010, 15:06:45 UTC
I totally agree. When I read this part of the book (and I read the book before seeing the miniseries), I must have gone back and reread the section where Mr Hale tells his family why he's leaving the clergy ten times or so, hoping I was missing something that would make Mr Hale's sequence of decisions and actions understandable. Doing what you feel is morally right is all very well, but screwing your family six ways from Sunday and not telling them about it until afterwords - aargh!

[I wrote a whole escited reply to this post yesterday, and then my computer got kicked off the network and ate my post. so, to paraphrase:]
your plot summaries above made my night. XD

I first read North and South for a Victorian lit class, & fell for it head over heels. (I think we had just come from reading The Mill on the Floss, so I didn't mind all the repressed angst as long as I got my romantic happy ending and the untimely ends confined themselves to everyone but the heroine.) I then picked up Wives and Daughters which I loved just as much ( ... )

Reply

tamnonlinear March 29 2010, 15:29:06 UTC
I really did like the book, despite my mocking it. I haven't read Wives and Daughters. I'll pick it up as well.

The other thing that struck me about the book (and about a lot of Victorian-era writing I've read) is how much stories tell us how to behave. At least, that's the only reason I can come up with for how some of these people respond to things.

For instance, when Mr. Hale dies, Margaret collapses on a sofa and just lays there for two days. Mr. Bell sits nearly and just waits for her to move again. The entire dynamic was just weird.

Or when Margaret gets hit with a clog during the riots- it's described as a small injury, but she's insensible and lays on the sofa and has her face washed with vinegar (ew) until she comes around.

It's hard to distinguish how much of it is a Victorian reading of normal human responses (the person is in shock or has a concussion or something like that) versus purely societally imposed response (a woman being frail, fainting, etc, because she is a woman and that's how she is).

Reply

kayselkiemoon March 29 2010, 16:42:48 UTC
Those are very intriguing points. I just went and read that scene in the book, where Margaret learns of her father's death - she lies "in the same state; white, motionless, speechless, tearless" - it seems very dramatic and extreme from a modern perspective. I do not know how much of Margaret's response Gaskell attributes to her circumstances - she has sustained so many losses that this last one takes her down - and bow Gaskell attributes to her gender. Margaret is unusually weak and passive following her father's death, and I think she is allowed to be so because she is a woman and people step in to help her. But I don't think Gaskell sees this as according to her character, but as a measure of her grief.

[This is quite interesting - I wrote and rewrote my reply as I cogitated. Such fun! ^_^]

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama eilonwy March 28 2010, 23:14:00 UTC
Yeah, I'm *certainly* not itching to live Back Then, whichever Back Then we're talking about at any given moment, my love of costume dramas and renaissance faires notwithstanding.

I haven't gotten to the funeral bit-- Margaret's mother, while on the edge, has not yet died (Frederick is about to visit, though, so I know it's close. And Mrs Thornton is about to be forced to promise that if Margaret does something of which she doesn't approve, she'll speak up.)

Well romances are not generally known for people sitting down and having reasonable conversations to clear up misunderstandings.
Too true. I have tried my hand several times at writing romance novels (yes, really) but I get stuck because... to me the answer always seems like it simply ought to be, "Tell each other the truth and have a conversation" which, oddly, doesn't seem to help the rising action...

Reply

Re: I have seen hell and it is white! Snow white!! /melodrama tamnonlinear March 29 2010, 14:29:57 UTC
I can do it if they need to be busy with other things (I don't have time to explain my life because the monsters are coming), but oddly enough, it seems there's an inverse relationship between how much time people have to talk and the amount of meaningful conversation they have. All these repressed people, sitting around in drawing rooms, Not Talking for hours at a time.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up