Just One Question

Mar 19, 2010 02:21

Greetings America and it's friendly if insignificant neighbors ( Read more... )

education, opinion, society

Leave a comment

Comments 119

(The comment has been removed)

enders_shadow March 19 2010, 06:36:09 UTC
"I believe in order for it to work voters must be educated politically."

Problem: voters are not educated/people don't vote

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

enders_shadow March 19 2010, 07:05:55 UTC
Unpack "for it to work" in my belief. It's connected to the "must" Sure we have democracy--but how well is it working?

Reply


little_e_ March 19 2010, 06:50:17 UTC
The problem as I see it isn't so much education as instincts.

Most people (especially as they get older,) think with their guts, not their brains. You can present them with factual information, but if it contradicts something they want to believe is true, it won't penetrate. You can present them with emotional appeals, and even if it makes no sense, it'll penetrate.

It's like when I talk to my mum about food, and she starts talking about things she's seen in margarine ads. I don't care where you stand on the butter issue, ads ain't the place to get your info. But ads aren't trying to be logical, they're trying to trigger your reptile brain, and that's why they work.

Reply

enders_shadow March 19 2010, 07:06:30 UTC
So how do we fix it?

Reply

little_e_ March 19 2010, 07:20:06 UTC
You can't. The best you can do is try to sculpt your arguments to appeal to them. Don't try to remake them to get them to listen to your arguments; just remake your arguments to appeal to them.

Or just ask questions until they contradict themselves.

Reply

enders_shadow March 19 2010, 07:26:23 UTC
"remake your arguments to appeal to them."

I tried doing that and pastorlenny said I was being anti-semitic.

Since when do contradictions stop them? Beck bitches about socialism but "educated himself" in a public library!

Reply


meus_ovatio March 19 2010, 07:39:06 UTC
Simple: compulsory lifetime education with a curriculum designed by appointed men of just and righteous character.

Reply

enders_shadow March 19 2010, 07:56:04 UTC
you would vote for such a measure?

Reply

a_new_machine March 19 2010, 12:23:18 UTC
I think it was a joke on Plato.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


thies March 19 2010, 08:39:31 UTC
single party system

Reply


mahnmut March 19 2010, 11:00:02 UTC
Less spin in the media and in school, that's what could improve things a bit.

I'm not saying send all pundits to GULag, altho some of them might really enjoy it there.

Reply

a_new_machine March 19 2010, 12:58:10 UTC
Define "spin." The issue with (good) spin is that it's arguably as true as the other side's "fact." Basically it's the injection of an opinion - any opinion, well-supported or not - into a factual discussion. But unless we limit our newscasters and newspapers to simple, active voice sentences, odds are we won't get an unbiased report out of a human.

Reply

mahnmut March 19 2010, 16:14:04 UTC
Good point. And mind you, even not adding any apparent opinion, just selecting the facts to present may sway public opinions in one direction or another.

Reply

enders_shadow March 20 2010, 22:20:54 UTC
" just selecting the facts to present may sway public opinions in one direction or another."

This is exactly what FOX does (aside from conflating opinion with news)

They spend God knows how much time covering the TEA party protesters in DC, but only spend a few minutes (4-5, iirc) covering the gay rights protesters in DC. Despite the size of the protest being roughly equal.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up