I think this vid is pretty succinct, how'dya think? Well, the exit polls are unambiguous. There'll be no 2nd round,
Putin wins the presidential election in Russia. 58-60% roughly. And no surprise there.
The result was anticipated, and is hardly a shock for anybody. More important is what the opposition's reaction would be and what are Putin's next
(
Read more... )
On political prisoners:
http://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/dissidents/prisoners.php
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/world/A0861075.html
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=23579
On dissidents being sent to Siberia:
http://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/dissidents/
On forceful deportations of entire ethnicities to remote lands far away from their original homes:
http://www.memo.ru/history/deport/
http://gulaghistory.org/nps/onlineexhibit/stalin/crimes.php
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3509933.stm
http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1058729.html
Deportation ot Tatars:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/not_in_website/syndication/monitoring/media_reports/1995670.stm
http://books.google.bg/books?vid=ISBN0415182972&id=lYMsIE5KjmMC&pg=PA130&lpg=PA129&dq=stalin+deportations+tatar&sig=cnQ1lERPtpcCT34zFUEgy8E-eAc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=stalin%20deportations%20tatar&f=false
Forced labor camps for non-Russian ethnicities:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/USSR.TAB1B.GIF
More on the deportations from across Eastern Europe:
http://www.migrationeducation.org/13.0.html
Tolstoy also wrote about the forced repatriation of millions of people:
http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=1988&month=12
A curious episode: the deportation of Jews into the Far East:
http://www.reds-on.postalstamps.biz/Russia/birobidzhan.htm
The history of deportation of Koreans:
http://kungrad.com/history/etno/kor/
http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/44692.html
Let's add the Holodomor, the "Secret Holocaust" in Ukraine:
http://www.holodomorct.org/history.html
http://www.thenewamerican.com/history/european/761
Do you have your own refutal to add, or you'd just dismiss it all?
Reply
I saw this the same wikipedia without proof.
The source can serve as a historical document, the work of the historian with a link to historical documents, and not fudge on the site (with pictures of bottles))), and links to news site. I do not see it.
For example, a historical document:
By the way, congratulations on the anniversary.
Reply
Yeah, I know. :-)
Which anniversary?
Reply
Well, the sites novayagazeta and BBC did not even go to allude to the mass media is mauvais ton. A novayagazeta in Russia is considered propaganda newspaper.
Which anniversary?
March 6, 1857 U.S. Supreme Court ruled that slaves are property, not citizens.
Reply
Good at least that you didn't cite Pravda as a source.
Reply
Yes, "Pravda" is also not a reliable source, as well as writings of the revisionists.
By the way, the court has recently ruled that the Red Army could not have shot Polish officers in Katyn.
Reply
Whose court?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1
Indictment : Count Three
COUNT THREE - WAR CRIMES
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/count3.asp
Russian court issued a similar decision.
Are you going to argue with the trials at Nuremberg.
Reply
Did you even read the above source that I provided?
And let's reassess where we started from, so we stay focused. You claim that GULag wasn't used as a tool for dealing with political opponents to the Soviet regime. That's patently false. Thousands of political prisoners perished in those camps and that's documented. You chose to ignore all the evidence, stating ridiculous reasons like "this is Wikipedia". Further, it was demonstrated that Stalin relocated millions of ethnic minorities to remote areas in order to disrupt their communities. You didn't even respond to that. Again, why should any of your arguments be taken seriously?
Reply
Yes, at the Nuremberg Trials were fools, and they wrote nonsense.
Well I quoted and gave a link, do not read it?
And let's reassess...
Yes, you can call political prisoners and Chikatillo.
But it is not. You can create a site and write it here and refer to it, but it will remain false.
All links that you gave have the same quality, and reliability.
And compare, I refer to the official document you refer to the BBC.
Again, why should any of your arguments be taken seriously?
It's your choice. I do not force.
Reply
Leave a comment