Page Feature for Plus/Permanent Accounts

May 04, 2007 07:20


Title
Page Feature for Plus/Permanent Accounts

Short, concise description of the ideaMany other blogging platforms (such as wordpress) allow users to create a blog page which becomes a static page that the user can name (e.g. http://user.livejournal.com/whatevernametheywant) as well as ( Read more... )

entry viewing, paid features, entries, journals: new sections, § no status, entry management

Leave a comment

trempnvt May 14 2007, 19:13:50 UTC
Don't tags pretty much cover this? I mean, not exactly, but they sort of fulfill this idea.

Reply

nomadmatan May 14 2007, 19:21:03 UTC
Tags do make it easier to find an entry; but applications like wordpress allow tagging and page making and I find both to be useful: while tags let you find related entries quicker, making a page allows you to create one particular page that has information that you can update that has no date/time attached and if you want to create a page with all of the places that you've fished, it you won't have to sort through thirty other entries about fishing to find it. The other benefit is that you would be able to reference a page in an email or at a bar talking with your buddies much easier "oh yeah, go to user.livejournal.com/fishing-sites, Chuck and you'll find where I've been"

Reply

sagamii May 15 2007, 12:56:34 UTC
I might be the minority here, but I personally dislike the idea. It's probably because I see it as being redundant ( ... )

Reply

kutsuwamushi May 14 2007, 19:26:11 UTC
If you don't mind creating an individual tag for each entry that you want to have an easily remembered URL, you could do something similar. But it

* wouldn't link to the actual entry, just to the tag page
* would make users' tags lists more unwieldy
* is different than how tags are usually used to mark categories

...so there are definitely drawbacks that keep it from being a desirable solution for people who might want this feature.

Reply

nomadmatan May 14 2007, 19:31:56 UTC
Thank You :o) You explained it much better than I did.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up