LJ top make the bots. Stop bots. Stop spam.

May 28, 2011 14:21


Title
LJ top make the bots. Stop bots. Stop spam.

Short, concise description of the idea
Disable by default sorting records by number of hits in the top. Add the confirmation code ReCaptcha, when users to vote in the polls and evaluates the record LJ.

Full description of the ideaDisable default sorting records by number of hits in the LJ top. I ( Read more... )

cyrillic services, ratings / rankings, § no status, spam

Leave a comment

Comments 15

cos June 9 2011, 01:46:47 UTC
I cannot make any sense of this suggestion. What is it suggesting? Anyone who gets it want to explain?

Reply

boredinsomniac June 9 2011, 02:55:12 UTC
I think "top" refers to LJ Times. The OP thinks the current algorithm for choosing LJ Times entries causes a lot of bot entries to display there, and suggests changes to the algorithm that will favor real entries.

There are also some suggestions for catching more bots in general.

Reply

cos June 9 2011, 03:47:56 UTC
What is "the evaluation record"?

Reply

boredinsomniac July 3 2011, 13:07:57 UTC
User evaluation of the quality of an entry?

Reply


trixieleitz June 9 2011, 01:56:03 UTC
What do you mean by "LJ top"?

Reply

boredinsomniac June 9 2011, 02:44:51 UTC
I think this is about LJ Times.

Reply


ktn5u8sf June 9 2011, 10:36:32 UTC
I'm talking about the count of the number of views and rating records. Evidence that the rating records make bots.


... )

Reply


My new suggestions ktn5u8sf June 9 2011, 11:15:25 UTC
I propose to make the following functions to stop spam and political spin-doctoring in the top LJ.

1. The procedure for checking of intelligence. Once a day (or 2 days), the user should be checked necessarily.

2. The verification procedure should include something like this:
- The confirmation code ReCaptcha,
- The security question (example: "Enter the sum of five and three", and the number should be chosen randomly).
The number of attempts should be limited (eg, 10).

3. Advanced Settings blog. The blog owner should be able to disable certain functions for those users who are not vetted intelligence:
- to write comments,
- to vote in polls.

4. TOP LJ. This should take into account the views and estimates from only those users who tested intelligence.

Reply

Re: My new suggestions ktn5u8sf June 9 2011, 11:17:20 UTC
This post was rejected by the moderator. So I wrote here.

Reply

Re: My new suggestions boredinsomniac June 9 2011, 19:04:04 UTC
Yes, I rejected it because it looked like mostly a duplicate of this one. I should have explained that. Sorry if I misunderstood.

Reply


For Administration LJ ktn5u8sf June 18 2011, 04:44:33 UTC
Administration LJ how you can comment on the above information, those graphics? Real-time monitoring of the top 20 can be viewed here: http://protiv-er.ru/lab/top/
The proposed measure me, check all the users once a day ( http://suggestions.livejournal.com/1077888.html?thread=17311872#t17311872 ), of course has a drawback: it is not convenient. What the steps you intends to stop artificial wrap ratings and number of visitors?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up