The Ban (update)
It's over as of yesterday, which is quite nice, though I still take issue with the link.
Also, I finally spoke with the clinical supervisor at admin, and apparently the very next (week)day he called a meeting over at Uhlhorn and, apparently, had quite a few questions regarding the way things were handled. Somehow, he also managed to get the impression that I had thrown a pan at someone, which did not happen, and he has since been corrected on that account.
However, this is a serious win for me, regardless, as well as other people who are routinely treated unfairly, or singled out by Ann. He had serious issues with the facts that I neither received a warning letter (standard operating procedure before any serious punishments), nor was I included in the meetings leading up to the decision. It also proves that he was not included in the decision process, which he ought to have been.
Apparently, according to another person I spoke with, who was privy to the meeting he called, he gave those present an appropriate inquisition as to how this whole thing had come to the point it had, and expressed his dissatisfaction with said process and certain people's actions, or lack thereof.
So yea for this whole fiasco being (hopefully) behind me, and for the very likely possibility that it will factor into Ann's next review.
As an added note, I find it quite interesting, and not at all displeasing, that this inquiry came on the heels of a survey sent out to assess Ann and her performance, filled out by residents of the other program. A survey which did not turn out favorably in the slightest.
Slowly, but surely. Slowly, but surely.
Also, I finally spoke with the clinical supervisor at admin, and apparently the very next (week)day he called a meeting over at Uhlhorn and, apparently, had quite a few questions regarding the way things were handled. Somehow, he also managed to get the impression that I had thrown a pan at someone, which did not happen, and he has since been corrected on that account.
However, this is a serious win for me, regardless, as well as other people who are routinely treated unfairly, or singled out by Ann. He had serious issues with the facts that I neither received a warning letter (standard operating procedure before any serious punishments), nor was I included in the meetings leading up to the decision. It also proves that he was not included in the decision process, which he ought to have been.
Apparently, according to another person I spoke with, who was privy to the meeting he called, he gave those present an appropriate inquisition as to how this whole thing had come to the point it had, and expressed his dissatisfaction with said process and certain people's actions, or lack thereof.
So yea for this whole fiasco being (hopefully) behind me, and for the very likely possibility that it will factor into Ann's next review.
As an added note, I find it quite interesting, and not at all displeasing, that this inquiry came on the heels of a survey sent out to assess Ann and her performance, filled out by residents of the other program. A survey which did not turn out favorably in the slightest.
Slowly, but surely. Slowly, but surely.