English Lessons for Academics Part II
A Short Exercise: Translate the following passage into layman's terms:
Because a project’s originator is volatile when confronted with skepticism, independent critical analyses are essential to retain equilibrium within a consensus prerequisite. Thus, the ontological utility of the proponent’s innovative design is inversely related to its epistemic discourse.
Though the counterargument to the latter is essential to dictate, disquiet has been revealed about the frequency of the unsubstantiated generalizations about the legitimacy of a proposed adaptive framework, regardless of whether or not its analysis is apropos of quantitative measurement.
In conclusion, a specialised process has been operationalised to assemble linkages between proposals of participatory representative categories, and indicators that operate within an epistemological framework.
Can't figure it out? The answer is
It's complete nonsense.
Because a project’s originator is volatile when confronted with skepticism, independent critical analyses are essential to retain equilibrium within a consensus prerequisite. Thus, the ontological utility of the proponent’s innovative design is inversely related to its epistemic discourse.
Though the counterargument to the latter is essential to dictate, disquiet has been revealed about the frequency of the unsubstantiated generalizations about the legitimacy of a proposed adaptive framework, regardless of whether or not its analysis is apropos of quantitative measurement.
In conclusion, a specialised process has been operationalised to assemble linkages between proposals of participatory representative categories, and indicators that operate within an epistemological framework.
Can't figure it out? The answer is
It's complete nonsense.