Man, this seems to be "Characters Making Annoying Questionable Decision" Week on my TV Shows, it applies to all of them! :/ Though still a few good episodes besides that.
Let's start with SN, which I only watched last night, since I was busy marathoning s6 with
paradisekendra on Friday, lol...(good times, and I like the DVD case art, the back of the plastic
(
Read more... )
Reply
Oh man, I haven't watched Merlin since season 1 because of the lack of ArMor. That piece of dialogue you posted made me weep. I loved them so much together.Ugh yeah you probably made the right call if those were your preferences, because the show really does suck on that front after s1, or just Morgana in general! :/ In s2 they just forget that Arthur and Morgana ever had a relationship period, fraternal or otherwise, and in s3 they did show more of that again, but it was tainted b/c Morgana had had her ridiculous personality transplant by then, by which she no longer cared about Arthur and actively tried to kill him, ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Oh, it's about Uther then. Hm. I can't do that. It's a personal thing from bad personal real life experience and has nothing to do with the show, I guess, but it still clouds my judgement insofar as I really cannot watch couples with a big age difference or anything that is teacher/pupil, father/daughter, uncle/niece... and she is his ward. I mean okay, Morgana is not exactly helpless and perhaps it would be hard to victimize her in that context but I would still feel that way. I loved ArMor so much in season 1, I really didn't want to get my heart broken.Well I can understand that, this is the first such pairing for me, though part of it is after I realized that despite the age gap, he often treats her more like an equal or like a wife than someone below him--there are many such moments, like him talking with her about Arthur as if she wasn't Arthur's peer rather than his, etc. And for me it's mainly their angsty, messy, co-dependent ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Inconsistant writing of characters is just so annoying. I mean I get that there are several writers working on one show and that they even might change from season to season but really, there should be someone keeping track of how they defined the character so that they can stick with it. I liked Vanessa but I didn't really understand why she was there... She didn't seem to have a purpose.
I think they realized early on that Nate/Blair didn't have much chemistry with who they cast,
Ah, we have to agree to disagree on that one.
Reply
Of course Nate is a slut or written as one. I never said he wasn't. Personally I feel like the writers never knew what to do with him. So no, I don't think he's the ideal boyfriend by any means but by the same token he doesn't force himself on people (at least not in the few episodes that I have seen.).
Reply
Blair, on the other hand, has been a lot more consistent romantically, more or less. It was one of the issues with Chuck/Blair (even putting aside the other Chuck issues), that he kept falling for other women during their off-periods, but she kept pining over him, which was unfair to her and ridiculous...
Reply
Leave a comment