Hey all.
Can someone remind what is up with Liberals and this obsession with Google and G-mail?! Have these people ever looked into Google and their CIA or FBI connections? I think it's CIA. Maybe it's even NSA. I'm pretty sure it's CIA. My question is why should they be trusted, especially with this nonsense about all your e-mail convo's kept in Google's storage even after they're deleted.
Even their motto is subjective. I mean "Do No Evil" is a lot different then "Do No Harm". Like I said, it's subjective where "Do No Harm" implicitly says you won't committ ANY act that would harm someone. "Do No Evil" implies you would committ an act that causes bodily harm if you perceived it to be good or neutral. It's too gray from a legal sense and is nonsensical from a Spiritual one as well. I mean to believe that people are fully good or evil is so black and white and absurd. It's also so contextual and perceptual. Perceptual as it's obvious what one perceives as evil another may perceive as neutral or even good. That is not to say there are things that are pretty much cultural absolutes which most if not all societies worldwide would consider as forbidden actions.
More then anything "Do No Evil" is more of a feel good motto which sounds good but is empty. We're talking about something without teeth here.
Oh and let us do our duty to Google and paste them to the sticking post, the bulletin board, to explore the belly if need be and to furthermore demand a declarative about their intentions. A backing of this as well to not wreak of foeter pushed to the side as it were. The stench, the stench I hope not to wretch from this maw. Let this be reconciled with the door to the bathroom open and all the crap to see as soon as possible.
Even their motto is subjective. I mean "Do No Evil" is a lot different then "Do No Harm". Like I said, it's subjective where "Do No Harm" implicitly says you won't committ ANY act that would harm someone. "Do No Evil" implies you would committ an act that causes bodily harm if you perceived it to be good or neutral. It's too gray from a legal sense and is nonsensical from a Spiritual one as well. I mean to believe that people are fully good or evil is so black and white and absurd. It's also so contextual and perceptual. Perceptual as it's obvious what one perceives as evil another may perceive as neutral or even good. That is not to say there are things that are pretty much cultural absolutes which most if not all societies worldwide would consider as forbidden actions.
More then anything "Do No Evil" is more of a feel good motto which sounds good but is empty. We're talking about something without teeth here.
Oh and let us do our duty to Google and paste them to the sticking post, the bulletin board, to explore the belly if need be and to furthermore demand a declarative about their intentions. A backing of this as well to not wreak of foeter pushed to the side as it were. The stench, the stench I hope not to wretch from this maw. Let this be reconciled with the door to the bathroom open and all the crap to see as soon as possible.