My Paper

Dec 03, 2007 04:14

John Scribner Presents: "The evolution of 'The Menaechmi', 'The Comedy of Errors' and 'The Boys from Syracuse,' or, All these plays Suck ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

scytheandroses December 3 2007, 06:10:08 UTC
BECAUSE CLEARLY THEATRE HISTORY PAPERS ARE MADE OF WIN.

AS IS PLAUTUS.

OF COURSE.

...*may be doing the avoid-paper-by-commenting game... who knows?*

Best of luck with the rest, anyrate.

Reply


catodragon December 3 2007, 09:47:56 UTC
SCRIBS! It's so sad that you didn't enjoy 'Comedy of Errors'! My first paper that I wrote over here was actually on 'Comedy of Errors' and how Shakespeare developed it from 'The Menaechmi'. I actually liked it. Well whatever. We'll have to compare notes when I return. I hope your other papers go well!

Reply

scribdecahedron December 3 2007, 15:44:37 UTC
It wasn't quite as bad as I made it out to be last night. I had been working non stop for about twelve hours at that point, and was rather unjustifiably grumpy. But definatly looking forward to having you back around the Dale!

Reply


ljmorris December 3 2007, 16:08:09 UTC
In my ever-so-humble opinion, 'Comedy of Errors' is the bard's funniest play, bar none. That certainly doesn't make it his best,/em> comedy by far, but it is one of the few that has me regularly busting a gut laughing while reading it. Hope the paper went well.

Reply


quisara December 4 2007, 02:54:28 UTC
At the very least, I think we can all agree that of these three, "Comedy of Errors" is the best.

"Boys from Syracuse"=*big shudder*

Good luck on the paper.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up