puwah lengthy

Jul 14, 2008 21:08

I owned.... Peter Stokes of Salt Shakers. Basically, it's the American Family Association for Aussies. Only read this if you've got the time... also it's a lot about you know, the gay.



I sent:
=============================
Looks like you lost.

The L Word is now on Movie Extra. They don't have advertisements.

Seems like you can't get them lesbians off TV.

Also, whats your beef with gay people? It makes no sense for you to hate them.

==============================

He replies with:

================================

Hi, Nice of you to write even if in a nameless fashion.
NO, we have not lost, we fought to get the L Word off free to air TV and WON - it has never returned. I think it was the movie version on Movie Extra

As for hating homosexuals, how do you come to that conclusion? Society bans smoking and tells people it is unacceptable - that does not mean we hate smokers - just what they do. Why, because the evidence clearly shows that it is unnatural and unhealthy and the consequences for the individual and society can be, and often are, devastating.

Exactly the same can be said for homosexuality. It is not natural - neither two men or two women can have sexual intercourse naturally. the health risks are clearly pointed out in many 'health reports and 80% of all aids in Western countries is related to men having (unnatural) sex with men.

Doctors statement "Homosexuality (anal Sex) is biologically abnormal.Under the microscope the lining of the rectum is columnar epithelium which is absorptive. Whereas the lining of the vagina is stratified squamous epithelium which is a "wear and tear" lining. Thus anal sex results in fluid absorption - hence the prevalence of HIV in male homosexuals

Also check out - homosexual web site
http://www.glma.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageID=692

We also know many EX homosexuals - people who once thought that was the way they were born - now they are free.

It is not hate to tell someone, or society generally, that something is dangerous. It is not hate to want children to have a mum and a dad, it is not hate to tell people they can be free to love naturally.

Regards

Peter Stokes
Executive Officer
Salt Shakers
03 9800 2855
0413 084 145
www.saltshakers.org.au

================================

And then, I says:

================================

The name is Kathleen. Kat is also welcomed.

No, there is no 'movie version'. Season Three is being aired on Movie Extra. Also, no victory was truly claimed. You probably got it off the air, but you made the entire Salt Shakers collective look like a bunch of arrogant, snobby, censoring bastards. We don't censor your pocket sucking televangelists, so please leave the gay community in peace as Jesus would have wanted you to do.

How do I come to such a conclusion? For a start, the SS pressured a lot of advertisers to cut their ads from The L Word. Never mind the soulless, depraved SBS and their viewing of Queer As Folk (Funny how they show little to no ads on that channel), but you will delightfully foam at the mouth when something like this comes up. Also, if you're trying to create a pun between "fag" as in, cigarette, and "fag" as in homosexual, then you sir are really, really clever. Really clever. But honestly, I think it's just as bad to parallel human love with cancer sticks. Cigarettes are also more approved by the governments, cause they can't make up their mind on which fag they want to side with. :)

Lets go through a few facts. Tried and true by scientists and statistics. This is stuff that tends to be a bit harder to deny than say, a 4000 year old book translated time and time again by people often pushing their own agen... Sorry, back on topic now. At the bottom of the page will be a set of links for you to follow up on. These are my resources, and if you could kindly point to a secular source without bias to back your claims, I would be delighted to read on it. However if I see any of this Exodus International crap in your response, I cannot count your arguments as credible as this is a biased source. This also counts for your own website, since you could just as easily type up some "facts" to lie for Jesus.

Firstly, more heterosexual couples [statistically] have anal sex or try anal sex than gay men (1). Now you argue that being homosexual is unnatural and only opens to diseases- but wait, the clean cut heterosexuals are doing it too? That would mean that now they are being abnormal just like the gays, according to, and I quote this statement from you: "Doctors statement "Homosexuality (anal Sex) is biologically abnormal." (Also, please tell me which doctor you got this from. I'm interested to find out if any particular PhD bearing doctor would actually say this). Also, I think if a doctor was going to be anatomical, they would point out that the prostate recieves much stimulation from anal sex [See Diagram (2)]. In case you do not know, the prostate is the male equivalent of the female G-Spot. If this wasn't nature at work, what was it? An accident from God, just like the appendix? Oops.

Second, lets have a look at the Bonobo (3). The Pygmy Chimpanzee. Anatomically a close relative of ours and both the Bonobo and the Human belong in the same Family according to the classification system laid down by Linnaeus. Cute little ape, right? Well, these apes are almost entirely bisexual. To quote, "Sexual intercourse plays a major role in Bonobo society, being used as a greeting, a means of conflict resolution and post-conflict reconciliation, and as favors traded by the females in exchange for food". Read further into article three and it'll tell you more. Now, this is nature at work. If natural law states that two of the same gender cannot go together, then why does the Bonobo (and many other animals) do such a thing as defy natural law?

There is no correlating evidence to suggest that an entire society can be destroyed simply because gay people existed. You might say Sodom and Gomorrah, but alas- no archaeological evidence is found of these two cities. The Bible does not make for strong evidence as some passages are parables and are not meant to be taken at face value. Rome? Died out to decadence and war. Greece? Same reasons. No empire rules supreme forever, as society evolves too much for that to happen. To say that the mentioned countries died purely because of gay acceptance only assumes that you are speculating and not seeing fact. If you believe that God "brought" these things to the Roman and Grecian empires because of homosexual activities- again, you've assumed not only that God exists, but that he hates an entire minorities activities so much that he will destroy the country for having this minority. It is ludicrous due to the simple fact that many other sins in the bible should also be noticed, as Levitican law states that eating shellfish, working on a sunday, eating a cheeseburger and wearing a cotton polyester blend is just as bad as homosexuality. Don't trust me? Read your damned book for a change. If you don't think these laws apply, then homosexuality is exempt since you have no grounds to have it as a "more solid" law. Also, the bible states all sin is equal in the eyes of God. Think twice before crying "Queer!", you just never know if God caught you eating bacon before your work shift that sunday morning.

Safe sex is safe sex. Nobody is "immune" to STDs as you seem to imply, and people who bareback and refuse to use protection only set themselves and others for a lot of trouble. That's just basic common sense: prevention is much better than cure. Heterosexual people have HIV due to unsafe sex, as well as sharing needles. 71% of AIDS victims are gay, yes, but AIDS did not form from homosexuality. Recent studies show that AIDS may have shifted from Africa, to Haiti, then to the USA in 1969 (4). The article makes no mention of anal sex being a direct cause of AIDS.

I'm not sure why you're linking me to this article about transgenders and health problems, but thank you. It was somewhat informative.

Ex homosexuals? Okay look, if there are people who honestly think they are cured of "the gay", so be it. I personally see it as living a lie. I don't think it's right to push people into having a straight marriage and having kids to "really" convince them out of it. Not only have you harmed the individual, but potentially the partner and kids as well. But look, live and let live. If people are dumb enough to believe that being gay is a mental illness (which was ruled out in the 50's by the AMA) or that it is unnatural, then they can do what they like. However, you should quit shoving your ideas on people who are clearly not interested in your agenda.

It becomes hatred when gay people become outcasts and the target of bullying in schools. It becomes hatred when a child is forced out of home for coming out to their christian parents. It becomes hatred when dangerous and inaccurate portrayals of gays and lesbians are seen as the norm of the entire queer community and face discrimination as a result. It becomes dangerous when people are murdered for being who they are. It becomes hatred when an entire government stands up and says no to basic human rights of two people who just want to love each other and make ends meet.

Your message is nothing but fuel for the fires of homophobia. I'm telling you now that this love is natural. The love I have for women is much deeper than anything I could have with any man, ever. Also, just because you have the belief that something is weird and icky to you, doesn't mean you have the right to downgrade an entire minority because of your view. That is arrogance, an offshoot of pride- one of the seven deadly sins.

I should have warned you that I don't hold back in a debate like this.

-Kathleen.

(1) http://www.straight.com/article/healthy-sex-is-all-in-the-talk
(2) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Penis.svg/180px-Penis.svg.png
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo
(4) http://www.pnas.org/content/104/47/18566

=========================

Bam. I'll keep you lot up to date on this one.
Previous post Next post
Up