Dennis Kucinich petition supporting impeachment of the President of the United States. As citizens of our nation, in writ mentioning two elected officials it is not proper to refer to one by name only, and the other merely by office held.
Oddly, the Constitution of the United States makes no mention of petitions when it comes to the impeachment of officials for "high crimes and misdemeanors."I formally request that you reevaluate this statement
( ... )
Dennis Kucinich petition supporting impeachment of the President of the United States.
As citizens of our nation, in writ mentioning two elected officials it is not proper to refer to one by name only, and the other merely by office held.
Oddly, the Constitution of the United States makes no mention of petitions when it comes to the impeachment of officials for "high crimes and misdemeanors."
I formally request that you reevaluate this statement.
In the first amendment to it, the constitution of The United States of America mentions petitions in regard to, the right of the people to seek redress of grievances.
If the grievance held by the people stems from acts of "high crimes and misdemeanors.", then the people have the right to petition their government for redress. Would you stipulate to the truth of that statement? Nope. Impeachment is a power of the Congress per the Constitution. The House of Representatives is empowered to impeach, and the Senate is empowered to try the case and
( ... )
The piece of mine you quote is not a writ. I used the word "writ" in the same way that I presume you did here: BDS writ large in other words, written speech, or public statement. The burden for polite discourse, is greater for written speech than for unprepared oral speech. There are no sedition acts in effect to my knowledge that make it illegal, but it is considered to be cheap form of subtle denigration, most suitable for the media. This web site is LiVEJOURNAL, and not LiVEMEDIA, correct?
The piece of mine you quote is not a writ It only becomes an legal term depending on the "of X" that is added to it.
Nope. Impeachment is a power of the Congress per the Constitution. Technically the House of Representatives has "sole Power of Impeachment" (It relates to the precise nature of the word).
There is no mention of petitions in the clause which enumerates those powers of the Congress. In that clause, but read what I wrote, I bold faced the important words: In the first amendment to it, the constitution of The United States of
( ... )
ClarificationorbolusSeptember 2 2008, 11:10:36 UTC
Setting aside for the moment the question of, what exactly "tinfoil hattery" is. Is it your position that Rep. Kucinich is an example of "tinfoil hattery", or only Journalist DavidKevin?
Comments 5
As citizens of our nation, in writ mentioning two elected officials it is not proper to refer to one by name only, and the other merely by office held.
Oddly, the Constitution of the United States makes no mention of petitions when it comes to the impeachment of officials for "high crimes and misdemeanors."I formally request that you reevaluate this statement ( ... )
Reply
As citizens of our nation, in writ mentioning two elected officials it is not proper to refer to one by name only, and the other merely by office held.
The piece of mine you quote is not a writ.
Oddly, the Constitution of the United States makes no mention of petitions when it comes to the impeachment of officials for "high crimes and misdemeanors."
I formally request that you reevaluate this statement.
In the first amendment to it, the constitution of The United States of America mentions petitions in regard to, the right of the people to seek redress of grievances.
If the grievance held by the people stems from acts of "high crimes and misdemeanors.", then the people have the right to petition their government for redress. Would you stipulate to the truth of that statement?
Nope. Impeachment is a power of the Congress per the Constitution. The House of Representatives is empowered to impeach, and the Senate is empowered to try the case and ( ... )
Reply
I used the word "writ" in the same way that I presume you did here:
BDS writ large
in other words, written speech, or public statement. The burden for polite discourse, is greater for written speech than for unprepared oral speech. There are no sedition acts in effect to my knowledge that make it illegal, but it is considered to be cheap form of subtle denigration, most suitable for the media. This web site is LiVEJOURNAL, and not LiVEMEDIA, correct?
The piece of mine you quote is not a writ
It only becomes an legal term depending on the "of X" that is added to it.
Nope. Impeachment is a power of the Congress per the Constitution.
Technically the House of Representatives has "sole Power of Impeachment" (It relates to the precise nature of the word).
There is no mention of petitions in the clause which enumerates those powers of the Congress.
In that clause, but read what I wrote, I bold faced the important words:
In the first amendment to it, the constitution of The United States of ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment