Links for Friday

Jul 13, 2007 09:35

Yes yes, Potter tonight, Simpsons in a couple weeks, Superbad in August... but really, to hell with this summer, bring on next summer!

I had never written a book review before. Now I have. Somehow I got to review a music-related book which is odd because I've never really written a proper music review, either.

In non-jesse-penned review news, Read more... )

they might be giants, clips

Leave a comment

opiateslopes July 13 2007, 18:47:48 UTC
listen to all things, forests lately? it's better now.

Reply

rockmarooned July 13 2007, 19:56:47 UTC
It is indeed. I haven't listened to it in a few weeks but basically I listened and listened and listened until the only stuff I didn't care for floated around the middle of the album, practically undetectable. Which is a problem many albums I really like have so it's not a big deal.

The TMBG album I mention above actually had a similar effect, only much accelerated because I've only had it for a few days. But my first reaction to both was "oh, yeah, I guess this is pretty good... a little underwhelming" and then after a certain number of listens, I'm like, wait, which were the songs I didn't like?

I'm still not sure if Forests as good as II or III but their albums are remarkably subtle for the kind of music they supposedly make.

Reply

opiateslopes July 13 2007, 21:09:50 UTC
the weird thing for me was listening to all things, forests yesterday while doing dishes and realizing it's palomar's best record (haven't heard palomar I though). warren's delivering some of her best lines yet. maybe this is due to increased leeway given her by the fact that the band has the same lineup as on III. i'd heard the palomar 3.5 ep a few months before hearing all things, forests and i think the inclusion on the album of two songs from the ep tripped me up from being able to listen well through forests. now that some distance has set in forests has gone from sounding disjointed to sounding unified and somehow even more confident than the very confident II and III. i love those albums but it's great that palomar just keeps getting more awesome. though i was in brooklyn in june my schedule didn't permit attending any of their area shows. did you see them at union hall or luna lounge?

Reply

rockmarooned July 14 2007, 04:57:24 UTC
I didn't go to those shows -- the pattern that has set in is that I see their album-release show and then forget to look for any further tourdates because I take it for granted that they're always around.

I can see the new one as their best record in part because it's a little more concise and unified -- the other ones (I haven't heard the first one yet either) all have a few too many songs, each seeming like they're about to end several times before they do. Forests has a real build to what feels like a real final track. From "Top Banana" on out it's just great (and I love some of the earlier songs too).

I actually just re-listened to some of the EP because I burned it to a CD for the first time (so I could re-rip "Washington" to put it on a mix CD). The album version of "Woah!" is somehow much better.

Reply

opiateslopes July 14 2007, 19:20:38 UTC
the album "woah!" is really driving. having not listened to it in a while i remember the ep version as being perkier and more tinny, which is appropriate since the ep was labeled a demo. i hear you on the compendious front with forests. twelve tracks-two fewer than on II and III-makes the difference between palomar being one of my favorite bands and palomar producing a really great album.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up