The Rhythm Of Horror

Feb 04, 2008 09:20




I recently caught up with 1408, the well-reviewed Stephen King movie adaptation from last summer, with John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson. You could say that this story of a haunted hotel room is The Shining’s less assuming younger brother. I guess I found it acceptably diverting for a horror movie that mostly didn’t scare me. Much of its entertainment value can be chalked up to the presence of the always-watchable Cusack. He has to carry much of the film by himself while interacting with a set. So while half of my brain was enjoying Cusack’s low-key technical bravura, the other half was trying to figure out why it wasn’t scary.



I started out by thinking that the core fear the film was exploiting wasn’t particularly primal. Being trapped in a hotel room just isn’t one of my big terrors. (A few minutes later, I realized, wait a minute. I have been trapped in a hotel room!) Having gushers of water pour at me from a painting of a ship on a stormy sea does not feature on my extensive worry list.

The real problem is that the hotel room is a sort of hellish heroquest environment where anything can happen. Since the room can do anything to him and has to fill an hour and forty-four of screen time, you know it’s just toying with him for most of the action. The lack of limits on its powers make it less frightening; real world consequences are not in play within its walls. Also there’s no respite (unless you fall for the old “false rescue in a hallucinatory environment” trick.) Horror, like comedy, depends on a rising and falling pattern of tension and release. What’s really scary is when the protagonist gets to safety-and then that safety is violated. You can’t ratchet up the tension without corresponding downswings. It’s a rhythm thing.

Cloverfield provides a counter-example. When the characters find temporary respite, it becomes scarier, because you know another shoe is going to drop, and you're on edge, waiting for it to happen.

cinema hut

Previous post Next post
Up