MSM says to ignore the man behind the curtain
Caught manipulating facts and the truth about climate change (*cough*) the MSM has simply ignored a Senate hearing on the matter. (Referenced in an earlier article.)
I also heard some interesting scientific debate as to whether ice core temperature readings can really be used as a reliable indicator of whether carbon dioxide is related to global climate changes. Don't expect to hear much about this, though, since the CO2 proponent, Dr. Daniel Schrag of Harvard, was less-than-articulate arguing the affirmative. As of the writing of this posting, I haven't found a single news source that quoted from today's hearing. I did see and converse with several reporters but so far have yet to read any coverage.
What I did find online, though, was an AP article which briefly mentioned the hearing but quoted no one other than California Democrat Barbara Boxer, the incoming EPW chair. It went out late today and could easily have quoted from any of the Republican members of the committee but did not.
You can be sure that if this was a Senate dog and pony show in favor of the climate change hoax the MSM would make it front page news and proclaim that Congress "acknowledged" the "fact" of global warming.
Nor does the MSM acknowledge the existence of people who do not agree with the climate change evangelicals.
I went into the discussion expecting it would be more interesting than your typical congressional hearing and wasn't disappointed. Dr. David Deming, a geophysicist from the University of Oklahoma recounted an experience he had with an NPR reporter who hung up on him after he declined to say that he thought global temperature increases were human-caused.
Better to ignore them until they go away...or are silenced by acts of Congress.
I also heard some interesting scientific debate as to whether ice core temperature readings can really be used as a reliable indicator of whether carbon dioxide is related to global climate changes. Don't expect to hear much about this, though, since the CO2 proponent, Dr. Daniel Schrag of Harvard, was less-than-articulate arguing the affirmative. As of the writing of this posting, I haven't found a single news source that quoted from today's hearing. I did see and converse with several reporters but so far have yet to read any coverage.
What I did find online, though, was an AP article which briefly mentioned the hearing but quoted no one other than California Democrat Barbara Boxer, the incoming EPW chair. It went out late today and could easily have quoted from any of the Republican members of the committee but did not.
You can be sure that if this was a Senate dog and pony show in favor of the climate change hoax the MSM would make it front page news and proclaim that Congress "acknowledged" the "fact" of global warming.
Nor does the MSM acknowledge the existence of people who do not agree with the climate change evangelicals.
I went into the discussion expecting it would be more interesting than your typical congressional hearing and wasn't disappointed. Dr. David Deming, a geophysicist from the University of Oklahoma recounted an experience he had with an NPR reporter who hung up on him after he declined to say that he thought global temperature increases were human-caused.
Better to ignore them until they go away...or are silenced by acts of Congress.