marriage definition wank
FOR FUCKS SAKE!
loonylolydarko: hell yeah I'm a bit heteronormative, if homosexuality was the fucking norm we wouldn't be having this issue, would we?
loonylolydarko: We're not talking about people who aren't married, either, we're talking about marriage and procreation happens to be a subheading. There is a big etymological relationship between procreation and marriage, and just because you don't want to see it doesn't mean it isn't there. I'll tell you one thing, though - labeling everyone as prejudice gay-hater because they don't support gay marriage is an ignorant and judgmental thing to do. I do NOT discriminate against gays and I never will, so you might want to stop with that.
loonylolydarko: I'm just telling you the truth, you can take it or leave it. Discrimination sucks and I don't think gay people are weird or icky or undeserving, but you can't honestly say that homosexuality is "the norm" - neither are curly hair, blue eyes or white skin.
SAVE THE BEST FOR LAST!
loonylolydarko: I'm just saying that with regards to the historical nature of marriages, gays don't fit the mold -
Aside from the exceptions you mentioned and may have missed, married people had kids
"Married people had kids"
"Married people had kids"
(200,000 years later)
Marriage has become undeniably linked with having kids.
*When you eliminate that stigma for marriage then the entire argument can totally be refuted.
*WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN.
[I'm means_toanend jsyk.]
loonylolydarko: hell yeah I'm a bit heteronormative, if homosexuality was the fucking norm we wouldn't be having this issue, would we?
loonylolydarko: We're not talking about people who aren't married, either, we're talking about marriage and procreation happens to be a subheading. There is a big etymological relationship between procreation and marriage, and just because you don't want to see it doesn't mean it isn't there. I'll tell you one thing, though - labeling everyone as prejudice gay-hater because they don't support gay marriage is an ignorant and judgmental thing to do. I do NOT discriminate against gays and I never will, so you might want to stop with that.
loonylolydarko: I'm just telling you the truth, you can take it or leave it. Discrimination sucks and I don't think gay people are weird or icky or undeserving, but you can't honestly say that homosexuality is "the norm" - neither are curly hair, blue eyes or white skin.
SAVE THE BEST FOR LAST!
loonylolydarko: I'm just saying that with regards to the historical nature of marriages, gays don't fit the mold -
Aside from the exceptions you mentioned and may have missed, married people had kids
"Married people had kids"
"Married people had kids"
(200,000 years later)
Marriage has become undeniably linked with having kids.
*When you eliminate that stigma for marriage then the entire argument can totally be refuted.
*WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN.
[I'm means_toanend jsyk.]