Homebirth complications?

Dec 26, 2010 22:15

Does anyone have a birth story of a homebirth where there was a complication or transfer. Involving either mom or baby, or both? Hemmorage, neonatal recusitation, heavy meconium, shoulder dystocia etc ( Read more... )

complications - mother, complications - baby, home birth

Leave a comment

The "short version" of my birth story da_shpoon December 27 2010, 09:38:04 UTC
The VERY short version of the birth story is: all was going really well, until I was fully dialated & it became clear that Gabriel was in a weird position. We did some maneuvers/etc & got him to move... And then he moved to ANOTHER weird position... So we got him to move again... And then again he moved into another weird position. Lather, rinse, repeat for a day & a half. Eventually we decided to try coached pushing to get mr stubborn out, but it was recommended that we do that in hospital because it can sometimes cause distress for the baby & if we agreed that if we had to transfer, we'd rather do it with a happy baby than a stressed one. So, we went to the hospital, where they strapped on a bunch of monitors, brought in the Machine That Goes Ping, ushered in a large herd of people, put me in stirrups & reenacted every scary birth scene from every movie & tv show EVER (minus the nasty doctors, most of mine were really nice! The first doctor was a real bitch & wanted to do a c-section for no apparent reason, so we ditched her & got a new & better one, haha!). The suction thingy was needed right at the end (just to hold his head in the right position, I still did all the work, haha) & the doc had to turn his head by hand (because AGAIN, he was in a weird position) & I got an episiotomy & stitches.

He was given to me straight away, which was awesome & even though they cut the cord much sooner than I wanted (they wanted to do some tests because he was coughing up mucous), they did ask me before doing it & they let my husband cut the cord. Then after the placenta was delivered, they apparently removed 4 blood clots from my cervix (by hand) - I had no idea what was being done to me at this point, only that it hurt (less than what I'd been feeling for the last 36 hours, but still a lot. Then someone shoved the gas thingy in my face & suddenly one of the doctors was shoving things up my bum (no-one ever actually explained to me what they were exactly or why they did it, but that plus the blood loss caused me to get a fever later that day). Aside from the gas then (which made me feel really loopy, but only lasted a minute) & the local for the stitches, it was a drug free birth.

Then they let me hold Gabe for a few minutes (& he started feeding) before rushing him off to the nursery for more tests. My husband went with him, but I had to get cleaned up & prodded more, so I didn't get to see him for another 2 hours. I did manage to express some colostrum for him & got to feed him again when I went to visit him.

After much jabbing him with needles, one of his tests came back a bit funny & that MIGHT mean that he had an infection (OR it meant that he was stressed... I know which seems more likely to me!). So, despite his pediatrician saying that he seems perfectly healthy (aside from some very mild jaundice) & had no signs of infection, or of anything being even remotely wrong & that if it was up to him, that would be it, the supervisor (who had never met Gabe, let alone examined him) said that because we don't know for certain that he doesn't have an infection, he needs to be on antibiotics for 5 days. So then they gave him an IV.

When attempting to put the IV in, the hospital staff bruised my baby so much that his "very mild" jaundice turned into real jaundice & he had to spend a day under UV lights. Then the next day his test results came back & showed that he did not have an infection at all & they had just overreacted & made a healthy baby sick. *Sigh*.

On the plus side, because I kept questioning everything they did, they realised that they had screwed up & that I knew it, so they officially changed their policy not to check the test results before the recommended time & that if something *did* show up early, they would call it a "transitional period" & monitor the baby instead of just assuming it's an infection. So yeah, my son changed their policy!

Would I plan another homebirth next time? YES! After that experience, nothing could ever convince me to plan a hospital birth unless I had a *very* high risk pregnancy!

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story da_shpoon December 27 2010, 10:23:56 UTC
Forgot to mention, the "blood loss" was actually a whole litre of blood, so yeah I hemorrhaged... & not just a little bit either! One of the reasons my midwife wanted to transfer is because she thought I was going to hemorrhage, but I suspect that it was at least partially caused (or made worse) by the fact that they actually pulled the placenta out, instead of letting it come out naturally.

Both of us are now perfectly healthy & have been ever since we left the hospital! Gabe still has a few bruises & puncture wounds, but he's otherwise great. My mum managed to catch some nasty bug from the hospital though (she's better now)!

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story hermie December 27 2010, 15:48:41 UTC
cytotec is the medecine they put up the bum. its an antihemmorage medication.
THank you for sharing!

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story iworshipsatin December 27 2010, 16:22:49 UTC
Cytotec is a drug used for ulcers. Off label OBs use it for induction and it placed in the vagina not anus.

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story hermie December 27 2010, 16:48:19 UTC
it very much is given for hemorrhage inserted in the anus. for the very reason it should not be given vaginally for induction. it causes strong contractions and is absorbed quickly if given rectally and causes the uterus to clamp down and stop bleeding. we use it at homebirths.
heres one thing i can find on it. but i dont agree that it should be used as a prevention.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0689/is_4_52/ai_100171277/

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story duchess_k December 28 2010, 02:14:53 UTC
That's what it is *supposed* to be used for...

Reply

Re: The "short version" of my birth story da_shpoon December 28 2010, 05:43:54 UTC
Oooh, that makes sense! I got the impression from the hospital midwives that they didn't approve of the use of it (or that there was another method they preferred) because every single one of them had a really disaproving attitude towards it when they found out what it was.

The conversation usually went like this:

Hospital midwife (checking on my fever & noting the fact that I was on IV antibiotics): "So, how did you get this fever? Did you get/do you have an infection?"
Me: "Nope! They told me the antibiotics are a preventative measure because they had to manually remove a bunch of clots. Then they put something up my bum, but I don't know what it was."
Hospital midwife: "Hmmm... *checks chart* Oh, that stuff! *Annoyed look at chart* Yeah, that'd do it! Especially with that amount of blood loss, that would most definitely cause the fever! *Sigh*"

Reply


Leave a comment

Up