Watching the first few episodes of Gossip Girl, all I knew about it were very vague descriptions of a couple of the characters, and the identity of Gossip Girl. I’m not sure if it’s going to be a thing for me, but if I’d watched it without the big reveal I’d be really curious what it looked like to someone watching with that information, so.
(
episodes 1-3 )
Hmm yeah I find it a little frustrating because in retrospect Dan being GG and wanting to be on the inside could have made a lot of sense, but then by season 2 there is way too much logic fail there for me to switch off and believe that it was Dan all along, there are just too many instances where it will never make sense that Dan could have been behind certain blasts ( ... )
Reply
a lot of people took the GG reveal as Dan having some kind of multiple personality disorder, or even saw it as him being a complete sociopath playing around with his friends lifes, but I never saw it as all THAT devious?
I don't think GG would come off any better ethically if it wasn't Dan, though? The focus on Serena specifically becomes a little bit darker from this perspective, but spying on and publishing private information about people he's identifying, for apparently no reason other than it's fun, is pretty fucked up. He's definitely the most interesting character for that reason, though I doubt I'd have felt that way without knowing.
Reply
Reply
Reply
It was very manipulative and two-faced of Dan no question, but I disagree with the reading of Dan's secret alter-ego being a sign of real mental issues and being impossible to tie in with the Dan from the show. Because a lot of people do have that view that the Dan that they were following for six seasons must have been a complete fabrication if he was also GG, and that he was a full-blown sociopath all along, which seems...extreme to me
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment