Question about buying a used upright

Aug 02, 2010 22:01

Hi there! I'm new to the community, so I haven't had a chance to read more than 40 entries back. If my question has already been addressed, I'll keep searching the archives ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 10

(The comment has been removed)

lazerbug August 3 2010, 04:27:22 UTC
Ah, thank you. That didn't occur to me. I've sent an email to a local technician and I'll see what comes of it.

Reply


goingdriftless August 3 2010, 04:09:12 UTC
I would have a technician look at it. Also, check the model out in Larry Fine's Piano Book. (I think that some of it is even online.)

Reply

lazerbug August 3 2010, 04:27:56 UTC
Excellent thoughts! I've sent an email to a local technician and requested a copy of that book from my library. Thanks!

Reply


flaxendandelion August 3 2010, 05:41:59 UTC
Personally I'd invest in a newer piano that's in better shape. A 1928 piano, unless it's been looked after, and this one looks like it hasn't been, is more likely to not stay in tune and have a sounding board that's not in good condition.

Reply

lazerbug August 3 2010, 15:26:43 UTC
That's a good point. Thanks!

Reply


makinhistory August 3 2010, 16:07:20 UTC
I have a 1914 upright with the same problems - for me, it was nothing a good tuning and basic repair didn't fix. (The key hammers rot and fall off in older pianos.) But those old pianos require almost constant maintenance (like, a full workup every 3 months), and there are some things even good techs can't fix cheaply. (My E flat above middle C, if pressed too hard, hits the D string. Sounds HIDEOUS!)

In all, the old uprights sound amazing when they're kept up, but you might just end up paying more overall in tuning and repair fees than you would if you just paid more initially for a newer model.

Reply

lazerbug August 4 2010, 02:20:40 UTC
In all, the old uprights sound amazing when they're kept up, but you might just end up paying more overall in tuning and repair fees than you would if you just paid more initially for a newer model.

Yeah, I think you're right. The piano tech I contacted offered an even older upright that he'd done work on for only a couple hundred more than the one in the original post, so I'm gonna take a look at that next week. I can handle investing a hundred bucks a year in tuning it if it starts out playable; if it needs hundreds of dollars of repair work before it'll even play, then I don't really wanna deal with it.

Reply

katatonic_state August 4 2010, 15:58:27 UTC
I totally agree. My upright is from the early 1920's and it's a challenge to keep up. If I didn't own a piano, I'd definitely look for something newer. (My piano has been in the family for 60+ years, so it's a nolstagia thing... and I don't have space for a second piano in my current home...)

Definitely have a tech look at the piano you're interested in. If it proves to be more trouble than it's worth, talk to your tech about what you're interested in picking up. There's a good chance that s/he might know where you can pick a decent used piano for very little investment. (This economy makes it real easy to pick up an inexpensive instrument). For example, had I the space for it, I could have picked up a decent baby grand for $500 a few months ago.

Reply


burkle August 4 2010, 02:04:48 UTC
I ended up getting an old piano (from the very late 1800s old) that had been in my family. It has a twin at my grandmother's too ( ... )

Reply

lazerbug August 4 2010, 02:21:54 UTC
Yeah, it was not something I enjoyed playing when I tested it out. It'd need repair work for sure. Luckily, the piano tech I contacted offered an even older upright that he'd done work on for only a couple hundred more than the one in the original post, so I'm gonna take a look at that next week. I think I'll probably go for that one. Thanks for the insight!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up