(no subject)
Oh my God, http://www.livescience.com is my new favourite website. It's fantastic. Although I don't understand why a low variability of skull size would indicate movement away from Africa - I know I'm being dense here but I just don't understand the reasoning. Wouldn't it make more sense if there was higher variability the further you moved from the source?
Anyway, take a look at this (battles for the control of Iraq) - it's very interesting and fairly objective. History isn't exactly my thing, but I do enjoy it to a certain extent.
Have you heard, by the way? A "lovely bloke" called Bishop of Chelmsford is actually "evil", according to the vicar of Dagenham. Yes, that's right, children - Mr of Chelmsford has a progressive attitude towards gay rights, and is therefore contaminated with the gay. Mr Wood, understandably, is scared that he might get some on him.
PS: CHRIS LANGHAM, YOU STUPID BASTARD, I THOUGHT YOU WERE AWESOME AND NOW YOU'VE FUCKED EVERYTHING UP, YOU STUPID STUPID STUPID BASTARD
Anyway, take a look at this (battles for the control of Iraq) - it's very interesting and fairly objective. History isn't exactly my thing, but I do enjoy it to a certain extent.
Have you heard, by the way? A "lovely bloke" called Bishop of Chelmsford is actually "evil", according to the vicar of Dagenham. Yes, that's right, children - Mr of Chelmsford has a progressive attitude towards gay rights, and is therefore contaminated with the gay. Mr Wood, understandably, is scared that he might get some on him.
PS: CHRIS LANGHAM, YOU STUPID BASTARD, I THOUGHT YOU WERE AWESOME AND NOW YOU'VE FUCKED EVERYTHING UP, YOU STUPID STUPID STUPID BASTARD