Remember all that stuff I was saying about the film, "Load After Load," playing at the party of My Pal, Foot Foot? I take it back. Shame, shame, shame--what's wrong with me? Here's a problem with having (acknowledging) split motivations for every action
(
Read more... )
Comments 32
Reply
And don't be too guilty. I got what I deserved.
Reply
Reply
certainly my pal sebastian could deliver more relevant, damning and high-minded blows to his targets. i mean, you do go to brown.
Reply
Did you find the cartoon personally offensive? It wasn't put there to insult.
Reply
I think it would take a picture of my mother being raped by the ghost of my uncle to really offend me. At this point, I don't really find anything too shocking, so a funny cartoon isn't really going to do the trick. But I will question the motives and inspiration of an author and his work. Less to disagree with his point, but to rather bring attention to the pointlessness of his assertion. Like, sure- it's plenty easy to take a jab at hipsters, indie kids, hippies, economics students and other assorted college level douche-bags, but I just wonder if the ..... you know what? fuck it. I'm hella tired.
I guess I'm just sad that you left my party early :(
Reply
Reply
Reply
And by done well I don't me AF - that's hardly hipster - or midwestern aesthetic. Tight euro-style, indie-band referencing t-shirt, sharp blazer, rip tight jeans, maybe a porkpie hat; that looks good.
Reply
in your hipster portrait, don't forget the vintage converse or the bizarrely tight sweater...and the comp lit glasses
what the hell is a porkpie hat?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Personally, I'm swerving towards the position that truth should be defined as what is valuable to us, for any reason.
That's a misleading statement. What I want to say is "For every purpose, we can define a truth relative to it which is, in some sense, deserving of the name 'truth.'"
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
What are you referring to here? The cartoon? Somebody elses post?
I think the point about hipsters never self-identifying as such is really apt. It's the case of a (enter dork mode) category that captures a statistical regularity that shows up when you start trying to summarize information in a lossy way, but people's own social circles are too important to people for them to generalize over like that.
Also, it's funny that so many people rejecting any label (what does indie mean? It means 'not like/dependent on anyone else,' right?) fall into the same bucket.
Reply
all of this posturing seems silly. like, we're all just imbuing harmless, unimportant cliques with the the type of overwhelming and absurd philosophic importance that college students usually reserve for dissecting tv shows or poor people or whatever.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment