wtf?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cristina-page/hhs-moves-to-define-contr_b_112887.html
HHS proposes that institutions be allowed to define abortion as any way they want..... within reason...
reason being defined, in part, as the logic that moved for this proposal b/c of the preference of 49% of the polled population.
which means the other 51% were just fine with the current definition...
why is 49% begin considered more heavily than 51%? isn't 51 bigger?
I mean abortion is like gay marriage and divorce. we've got about a 50/50 split in the population with regards to points of view/usage...
but now, this proposal suggests that the 49% who believe life begins at fertelization (sperm meets egg, they have a party), can call anything that gets rid of that little party "abortion". (not a measurable condition by the way)
as opposed to the other 51% who believe life begins once that little party is firmly established in the lining and not going anywhere....(actually a measurable condition).
but it does limit the definition of abortion to be "within reason".
how reasonable? skreedle has a pretty broad spectrum list of what might be considered reasonable for being defined as abortion...
1. "Life begins at penetration" - you either said yes, or were asking for it, now deal
2. "Life begins at lust" - see above
3. "Life begins at menstruation" - you made it, therefore it was destined to happen. not letting it happen is WRONG!!
HHS proposes that institutions be allowed to define abortion as any way they want..... within reason...
reason being defined, in part, as the logic that moved for this proposal b/c of the preference of 49% of the polled population.
which means the other 51% were just fine with the current definition...
why is 49% begin considered more heavily than 51%? isn't 51 bigger?
I mean abortion is like gay marriage and divorce. we've got about a 50/50 split in the population with regards to points of view/usage...
but now, this proposal suggests that the 49% who believe life begins at fertelization (sperm meets egg, they have a party), can call anything that gets rid of that little party "abortion". (not a measurable condition by the way)
as opposed to the other 51% who believe life begins once that little party is firmly established in the lining and not going anywhere....(actually a measurable condition).
but it does limit the definition of abortion to be "within reason".
how reasonable? skreedle has a pretty broad spectrum list of what might be considered reasonable for being defined as abortion...
1. "Life begins at penetration" - you either said yes, or were asking for it, now deal
2. "Life begins at lust" - see above
3. "Life begins at menstruation" - you made it, therefore it was destined to happen. not letting it happen is WRONG!!