Back in the salt-mines/on the chain-gang/whatever

Jan 04, 2005 12:50


Dee Crystal update: this has been recovered, an arrest made, and a man charged, just before Christmas. This has not been extensively reported - two sentences in an article in the Independent about the recent thefts from the V&A. Presumably because the crystal and documentation are now evidence, they are not yet back on display. The thief is said to ( Read more... )

annoyance, dee crystal, crabbiness, editors

Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

oursin January 4 2005, 13:31:42 UTC
Sorely tempted but simply wrote back saying Bad Idea, and after a paragraph about where one might find 'dynamic' (ugh ugh ugh) images of some of the women included, added, did I say what a Really Bad Idea this is? (We could at least have had the right Pankhurst, surely? - this is just the sort of thing that informed reviewers are likely to pick up on.)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

oursin January 4 2005, 15:14:37 UTC
Christabel is in the book (Votes for Women! Chastity for Men!): so clearly we should have her mum on the cover...

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

oursin January 4 2005, 16:48:09 UTC
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson: one early women doc who does not feature, though several others do. Deep sigh.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up