Comments | ourlasthero: (без темы)

ourlasthero

(Untitled)

Mar 09, 2004 04:23

an examination of conscience... if you were in love with someone (or at least thought you were), and they didn't feel the same way about you for whatever reason, but you somehow acquired the ability to change that (i.e. you acquire the ability to change your appearance at will, you come across a number of wishes that can affect someones affections ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

forgive me im a hopeless romantic glitzygal86 March 10 2004, 02:45:52 UTC

i believe that u cant have true love unless it comes both ways so how can one then fall in LOVE and not have mutual feelings from the other person? i wouldnt want to alter anything about me bc 1. i think its important to accept yourself as who you are and if u dont like something than fix it...by a means that would make u proud that u worked so hard not by something that gives u no sense of accomplishment. and 2. i think that their really is one person out there for everyone, u know a soulmate kinda deal and by altering urself u could be altering ur chance of meeting ur soulmate and knowing that that is the one bc the soulmate was destined to fall in love with u not an altered u ( ... )

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic anniexchrist March 11 2004, 22:30:32 UTC

so i can't be in love with someone that doesn't love me back? that can't be true...we'd all be way happier.
and it's nice to think that we should all be happy with ourselves and have a soulmate, but honestly, i know there has to have been one point in time when you've wanted to change yourself for someone.
much love.

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic glitzygal86 March 12 2004, 03:50:29 UTC

i think that people like to fixate on things that they cant have and thus by fixating on it they convience themselves that they r in love. but i dont think true love can happen w/o the other person having the same feelings. bc in my opinion true love is the source of all happiness and if the person doesnt love u back how can that be a source of happiness?
and well yeah of course there has been times when ive wanted to change myself bc the other person didnt love me back...but w/ time i realized that they r the ones missing out not me and i will find someone who will accept me for me all faults included and not for anything else, thats what i think makes love so amazing that one can so easily look past the others faults.

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic anniexchrist March 13 2004, 04:41:12 UTC

not to start an lj battle (though that would be a good time in and of itself)...didn't you just contradict yourself?
i dont think true love can happen w/o the other person having the same feelings.
...
of course there has been times when ive wanted to change myself bc the other person didnt love me back
if they didn't love you back...you're implying that you loved them and it wasn't reciprocated. but that can't be, you say love has to exist from both angles.
danielle shirley tried to convince me of this once and i didn't get it, i still don't. love can be mutual, but it can also be one-sided. that's why there's heartbreak and marriages that continue with affairs. it's rare to love someone that loves you back.
i think. but what do i know.
much love.

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic glitzygal86 March 18 2004, 03:49:48 UTC

sorry it has taken me so long to reply to this i totally had a good reply and then my dad disconnected the comp bc im too much of a procrastinator, and then i was too lazy to rewrite it ( ... )

42! ourlasthero March 18 2004, 22:10:55 UTC

you are both wrong here because the truth is that love is a word. that is all. it's a word used to describe an emotion or "something you feel." if you feel like you're in love, you are. it's that simple. there is no greater cosmic meaning behind the word.

Re: 42! glitzygal86 March 18 2004, 22:39:59 UTC

42? dude ur so hardcore! and psh to u and ur rationality hehe

Re: 42! anniexchrist March 20 2004, 03:42:37 UTC

so...how am i wrong?

Re: 42! ourlasthero March 23 2004, 17:24:48 UTC

it's not that rare to love someone that loves you back. it's rare to be attracted to someone who's also attracted to you. and i doubt that's really all that rare...

Re: 42! anniexchrist March 23 2004, 22:22:02 UTC

jigga whaaa? so love is just a word, and it's not rare for it to happen?
it's rare for me to be attracted to someone that's attracted to me back. so love is just mutual attraction in any sense? this confuses me. you just happen to spell out the definition of love differently, i think. i'm pretty sure we're saying the same thing.

Re: 42! ourlasthero March 24 2004, 19:26:13 UTC

it's cause people are all like this kind of love that kind of love. really though, love = caring. attraction does not really equal love. you're attracted to people you don't love, you love people you're not attracted to. yeah... i lost my train of thought because bethany called and i have to go get ready for hanging out now. haha. but i think you get the idea.

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic ooer_yummychums March 17 2004, 21:00:47 UTC

doood that is so right on and how I feel. yaaaay!

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic ooer_yummychums March 17 2004, 21:04:24 UTC

and by that I meant Laura's comment. Not yours, Annie.

Re: forgive me im a hopeless romantic glitzygal86 March 18 2004, 03:50:25 UTC

hehehehehe

Back to all threads