(Untitled)

May 08, 2006 19:07

From the Tribune today ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

poesian May 9 2006, 03:28:28 UTC
It's a bad thing for the same reason using contraception is a bad thing: the Pope doesn't like 'em, and the Bible can be interpreted as saying so.

Reply


anonymous May 9 2006, 07:26:41 UTC
they took our jobs!

Reply

orion59007 May 9 2006, 19:11:25 UTC
Haha. I'm not sure if you meant what I think you meant but twas funny.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

orion59007 May 9 2006, 19:58:36 UTC
No ma'am, still in Chicago. I'm probably only going home for a week once school ends... I'm working up here this summer.

Reply


Well... anonymous May 9 2006, 16:03:02 UTC
Would the nobel prizes mean much if they were handing them out at every corner store? I'm not saying I give a shit, but is it really that hard to understand why it would annoy the shit out of some people? Blame it on the hulking behemoth of ignorance I like to call "religion".

Reply

Re: Well... orion59007 May 9 2006, 19:33:21 UTC
I completely understand why it would annoy some people. Some people are bigoted fucks. I was just hoping that maybe there was something more to the whole thing than just the "ick" factor or whatever it is that flips people out about gays ( ... )

Reply


publicurinal598 May 9 2006, 17:11:05 UTC
Jeez, you guys are cracking hard on the conservative folk. Like it was stated, it's a matter of belief and as much as we may tout separation of church and state, it's still inexorably linked. The "sanctity of marriage" is at stake because allowing gay marriage would demean the meaning of its popular interpretation. There are numerous parallels to this issue throughout history which receive the same treatment: status quo; people begin to question it; there is a counter-movement; the two ends collide for some time with legislation usually leaning towards one end; eventually the reformist movement makes way and gains some of its aims. I would assess an acceptable parallel to be the Black Rights Movement ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up