Ron Paul to Build Colosseum to Feed the Sick Uninsured to the Lions. It is The Humane Thing to Do.

Sep 13, 2011 02:32

Tea Party Debate Audience Cheers Idea Of Letting Sick Man Without Insurance Die (VIDEO)

The last two Republican presidential debates have been some of the most macabre on record. Last time around, at the Reagan Library, the crowd gave the biggest applause of the night to the 234 executions that have occurred in Texas while Rick Perry was governor.

In ( Read more... )

you stay classy, election 2012, eat the rich, flames on the side of my face, thank you! fuck you!, republican party, stupid people, tea party, health care, republicans, right-wing rage pimp, ron paul, murder, tea bagging, scumbags, libertarians, fuckery, evil, populism, fuck this guy, invisible hand of the free market, politics

Leave a comment

sizequeen September 13 2011, 14:31:24 UTC
In his defense, the subject of the question was a young single person who *elects* not to buy insurance. Wolf made a big mistake in that phrasing.

He should have asked what should someone who cannot *afford* 200-300 dollars a month do if they get cancer. He should have asked what Paul plans to do about the fact that a person could pay into insurance for years, and then find that their illness is not covered or not fully covered by insurance. Wolf should have asked about the high rate of medical costs related bankruptcies.

This is a horrible, horrible clip that reveals the heart of the GOP and the Liberterians, but Wolf's question was weak-sauce.

Reply

sihaya09 September 13 2011, 14:36:57 UTC
Agreed.

Reply

erunamiryene September 13 2011, 15:00:49 UTC
True, but still. Cheering about ANYONE dying in the hospital when there are means to save them is just fucking terrifying. It's just ... ugh, I don't have words for it.

Reply

moonshaz September 14 2011, 02:41:11 UTC
Nauseating would be one possibility. Out of too many to count.

Reply

militsa September 13 2011, 15:01:27 UTC
These are important distinctions, and you have a good point. I would like to see the audience's reaction to a better-constructed question. (Though I'm sure they would continue to disappoint me.)

Reply

bnmc2005 September 13 2011, 15:23:57 UTC
Semantics. Many of those people are "electing" to not get health insurance precisely because they can't afford it.

Reply

red_pill September 13 2011, 16:51:51 UTC
not so much. at least in the qustion, it was construted such that

- his got a well paying job
- but dosent buy live insurense

its a poor question. it fails to shed any intresting light on the issue, becous OF CORSE ron pauls gona say "well, he could aford health care but didnt (presumbly, given how the questions set up, to buy jet skis or something in his head) and now his getting his compunse"

a better, and more insightful question, would have phrased it as "didnt pay for health so he had room for his kid in a bigger flat" or whatever, to show that, it was a cant aford sitution. alsa, wolf blitzer didnt.

Reply

bellonia September 13 2011, 15:36:45 UTC
Maybe it's just the circles I run in, but nobody I know who "elects" not to buy health insurance for shits and giggles. Usually, it's "I can't afford it" or "I can't afford it and pay rent at the same time" or "I have pre-existing medical conditions".

Reply

hammersxstrings September 13 2011, 15:46:14 UTC
i have friends, multiple, that don't buy healthy insurance cause they're lazy. or they were so used to being under their parents plan and aged out and just never did it. not very responsible, i know, but that's how it was *shrug*

Reply

bellonia September 13 2011, 15:57:05 UTC
-shrug- there are exceptions to every statement. I'd still say that a) they don't deserve to die for being irresponsible, and b) they are the minority, so even for an example I'd call it inappropriate.

Reply

muppetfromhell September 13 2011, 16:21:06 UTC
That reminds me I need to get renters insurance.

Reply

keeni84 September 13 2011, 22:59:27 UTC
me too

Reply

hammersxstrings September 13 2011, 15:47:50 UTC
i would love to see an answer to that, from him. about not being able to afford it. I've always loved that argument from conservatives, who use the bible as a moral shield but don't want to actually live by it.

Reply

bib_specialist September 13 2011, 16:23:42 UTC
Because, in Blitzer's world, nobody is uninsured because they can't afford it or their employer doesn't offer it. Blitzer doesn't know anybody personally who is like that, so to him in his elite Villager world they don't exist. Also, if he had asked the question the other way, the GOP might have gotten mad at him and God forbid think he was a liberal, and we can't have that, can we?

Reply

lickety_split September 13 2011, 18:17:58 UTC
In his defense, the subject of the question was a young single person who *elects* not to buy insurance.

So he still deserves to die?

Reply

sizequeen September 13 2011, 22:45:38 UTC
Did you read the whole post, or stop after that sentence? My opinion of Paul's attitude is perfectly obvious.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up